Fathom
Power Member
- Jul 1, 2011
- 518
- 282
Yes that would be much better but if they really wanted to couldnt G just buy any service and find out which ones are in the network?
I guess so. Do you think that would be cost effective for google?
Yes that would be much better but if they really wanted to couldnt G just buy any service and find out which ones are in the network?
Could you use a more visual metaphor!?![]()
jk !!!!!!!! please don't lol
I guess so. Do you think that would be cost effective for google?
I think it would be more cost effective for them to do that then make new updates/algos whatever to find them. I am by no means an expert I am just saying whats on my mind with these blog networks. I really do want to find one that is powerfull yet will not be found.
After the recent updates I thought blog networks were pretty much finished. Unless you have your own private one but thats a different story. I had really good results with them before the updates but I thought now they are pretty much useless, especially the ones that are advertised since the big G knows about them. Is this correct or am I missing something?
I guess so. Do you think that would be cost effective for google?
highly cost effective - $20-50 for a submission somewhere or paying some pointy head $100+ p/h to find and reverse engineer
How would you reverse engineer a blog network that are in no way connected to each other? The only way possible is if Google themselves purchased links from every single blog? do you know of any other way? Private blog networks are not dead, infact if done right they are the most powerfull link building method out there.
A good alternative to private blog networks would be some serial guest posting on legit high quality, high traffic, ******** blogs!
30 * 600-700 words articles for guest posting would cost close to ~$210... unless you write them yourself!
As someone that accepts guest posts on multiple blogs I will say that I'm very specific to what I accept. I'll only accept articles that I feel are deserving to be published on my blog. For example if someone thinks that they are just going to write a keyword rich article and publish it on my blog for free then that person is highly mistaken, and if a blog owner did accept articles just for the sake of being unique then more than likely that blog is not worth submitting to, why? Because the quality isn't there, the quality that real visitors think wow I love this blog, or the quality that tells Google wow these blog pages are earning real high quality authoritative links.
Some things I look at when accepting guest posts:
Is the title written in a way that is appealing to potential readers?
Is the language in good English, free flowing, easy to read, informative? Is the content unique, educational, well researched? is it written for potential viewers or is it keyword stuffed?
Are images included? If so is it unique and relevant? Images are preferred as it keeps potential readers on your blog. Nobody wants to read a boring newspaper article full of 100's of words all compacted together, at least not on a blog anyway.
Does the post include bullet points, sub headings, charts, or anything to improve the appeal of the post?
Is the outgoing link trustworthy, relevent, informative?
Is the outgoing link pointing to MFA sites, any other kind of nasty site?
These are all things that someone who accepts guest posts looks for. Guest posting is not frowned upon by legitimate white hat SEO professionals, in fact I regularly accept high quality posts from big brands, and well known SEO companies.
There are many benefits between legitimate guest posting and high quality blog networks. Alot of people don't realise the power of a high quality link because they have never had one. In reality people talk about diversity, nofollow, bla bla bla, but all it takes is a few high quality links to rank a site for a competitive keyword.