Reelnetwork
Power Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 684
- 248
They are basically killing the revenue of every website, so why they aren't sued or just jailed for making such senseless software?
LMFAO.
LMFAO.
Joke thread?
The cable companies that offer DVRs for recording TV shows should be sued too. It lets people fast forward through commercials and skip them!! They are killing the network TV's revenue!!
You are trolling now...
TV ads are paid for there popularity, you still have to watch the whole show.. Which adds there view.
In ads you are not paid by 'views' by from clicks. And for clicking you have to watch it first.
You can simply write affiliate ad rotators which don't get blocked by Adblock, however your likely to find people running Adblock are unlikely to click on the ads anyway. Or you could just generate new revenue streams it's hardly like network ads are the only revenue source for webmasters. Plus you can also code your site in a way which either gives users a message that their using Adblocker and your site relies on ad revenue or you can just deny access to users using adblocker. Lots of options.
You can't be serious. Advertisers pay for TV spots with the assumption that their ads are reaching a certain number of eyeballs. If people can skip the ads, the value of that spot goes down. It's exactly the same as adblock, but I find both adblock and DVRs to be totally fair game. Advertisers have the right to play their games to get into your head, and consumers have the right to fight back if they don't want to see ads.
If you're unhappy with your ad-supported model, start charging people for your service. It's your job to decide what's cost-effective for you, not theirs.
Maybe in your country, but not mine or others.
Please enlighten me as to how advertising works in your country. I am open to the possibility that the advertising market is a$$-backwards in other countries.
The reason I think these two points are important is because there have been companies who have been sued for masking ads by deceiving the user and generating profit for themselves.
SSSSSSSSSSSssssssssssooooooo, which law are they breaking actually then? I think you actually have to break a law to get sued...
There were news in 2009 i think, and indeed, many of them would try making business out of such users.
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1030_3-6207936.html