Which one is better Lindexed, linklicious, or linkclaw?
- Thread starter obolang
- Start date
SuperNoobInc
BANNED
- Dec 28, 2011
- 474
- 35
Oh right. I meant "nulcear link indexer".
It is quite expensive; $117 per month for 30,000 links.
However, I like their interface and most of my links do get indexed pretty fast.
However, with only 30,000 monthly volume, it only supports probably around 4-5 senuke blast.
Dan Da Man
Elite Member
- May 31, 2011
- 1,851
- 939
If you think about 30,000 that isnt a lot of links. I wish there was something more affordable for say200k a month. I havent found anything even close to effective as NLI.
Linklicous sucks and Lindexed sucks as well. Worthless IMO
SuperNoobInc
BANNED
- Dec 28, 2011
- 474
- 35
30,000 is in fact a lot of links.
But ever since the latest SeNukeX update; Each Monty blast gets around 5000 links;
Then AMR alone will get another 200-300 live links; So total of each 'run' is around 5300 links; and I do this for each website once per week.
I have a couple of websites; and 30,000 will only allow me to blast around 5 websites per week. So yeah.
I can definitely stretch it longer to like 2 weeks per website, but still....
So i m thinking of upgrading my subscription now.
As for linklicious; I am still with them on the $14.99/month plan.
I just put my SB links there. They arent really meant for indexing anyways.
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,695
- 107,108
I'm a big fan of lindexed.com... of course owning part of it kind of has me leaning towards the positive.
Dan Da Man
Elite Member
- May 31, 2011
- 1,851
- 939
In fact 30,000 is not a lot of links. SEnuke is shit and the amount of links that thing can produce while babysitting it is shit.
Poppa Rotzee
Power Member
- Apr 10, 2011
- 511
- 163
Actually, that is what has always seperated linklicious from other pingers. Its one of our biggest selling points. We don't ping all at once and at one time. We allow users to schedule their links to drip out at a rate they choose which will appear naturally. =)
Typlo
Supreme Member
- Sep 22, 2010
- 1,356
- 516
Linklicious does exactly what it says - gets your links crawled and found and increasingly indexed by google. (Indexing isn't required to improve your ranking, which is an important distinction most SEOs don't fully appreciate)
I'm not familiar with linkclaw but do see that they use RSS feeds. We actually removed RSS feeds from Linklicious at least 6 months ago because it ended up HURTING rankings. There is a lot more backstory here, but that was the net result.
You can see a case study comparing the efficacy of link crawling/rss feeds/doing nothing but link building. It's on a different forum, but you can find it by searching "case study crawling comparison"
I'm not familiar with linkclaw but do see that they use RSS feeds. We actually removed RSS feeds from Linklicious at least 6 months ago because it ended up HURTING rankings. There is a lot more backstory here, but that was the net result.
You can see a case study comparing the efficacy of link crawling/rss feeds/doing nothing but link building. It's on a different forum, but you can find it by searching "case study crawling comparison"
Poppa Rotzee
Power Member
- Apr 10, 2011
- 511
- 163
Linklicious has nothing to do with the penguin update. Linklicious only shines a spotlight on the work you did. It makes sure Google knows about the links you build. Now, how you link build and how that affects Google, is on you. What needed to change, was your linkbuilding strategy, not your tool. You need to diversify your anchor text and link build to a larger group of keywords. Lindexed is going to do the same thing, worse actually.
They only allow you to schedule for 5 days. So any links you add, has to be completely dripped out in 5 days. If you add 10,000 links...then 2000 go live every day. Thats a lot, and you better hope your website can handle it. Not only that, they don't keep your links live so eventually when Google comes back to crawl...it will throw an error. Do you really want that?
Poppa Rotzee
Power Member
- Apr 10, 2011
- 511
- 163
Did you send a support ticket? This literally can't happen, we have 100% crawl rate for all paid users. I'd be happy to look into your account if you want. It is possible that it didn't always take an hour, but almost all get crawled within a day and they all WILL get crawled. The only thing I can think happened, is that your payments got declined and you bumped down to a free account and didn't notice. There, you would have only about a 20% crawl rate.
Poppa Rotzee
Power Member
- Apr 10, 2011
- 511
- 163
Very true! Its one of the most parroted, misinformation on the forums. Everyone screams indexing, indexing, indexing and they have no idea how irrelevant tracking indexing is. Indexed links are more valuable, but using it as a measurement tool is pointless and spending money on GETTING links indexed, is not cost effective. Better to either just ping them and get them crawled, which adds them to googles crawled database (which starts improving serps and indexing happens naturally) or just buy indexed links.
Well given that the majority of sites online have RSS Feeds its wrong to suggest that RSS Feeds hurt rankings. For example, all Wordpress sites use RSS Feeds by default.
RSS Feeds only hurt rankings when abused in certain ways.
The aggressive way Linkilicious used to use RSS Feeds was obvious to me for a long time that it would damage rankings, so its great Linkilicious no longer does this.
The power of LinkClaw is its flexibility in how RSS Feeds cab be used, so users can use it in a whitehat way (recommended), or be more aggressive (not recommended).