I would not use them on either! I may be wrong here, but the logic I use is simple - when something comes up and openly advertises itself as a 'network', I would not touch it with a bargepole. Even if the network is showing results today, when it gets hit, it'll take down everything which it helped bring up.
But then, that is a call for you to take![]()
One for long run and another for short?Make 2 sites. Use SAPE on one, build other links to the other.
It is - but in the mean time you are making money.
Also - good thing about SAPE is - the month you stop paying they take your links down so no need to "disavow" or anything.
Business is all about risk and nothing is permanent.
I made a lot from BMR a few years back - probably 50x more than I spent on them and there links. They got took down - I removed my lnks - the sites suffered 6 months in the wilderness came back strong.
If you have one site and all your eggs in one basket then maybe not SAPE - but for most it's just a business risk, and like everything in SEO it will likley not work one day in the future - so you take the cash while it's on the table and roll with the punches when they come.
Scritty
Hey guys -
If you stop paying and suddenly ALL of your SAPE links are removed -
that isn't necessarily a good thing.... just saying. I mean, maybe the negative PR wouldn't be there, but if you aren't diversified and that SAPE link makes up the majority of those connected links to your tiers, you're still screwed.
Agree, I would use SAPE as part of my strategy, not being the majority of my backlink profile![]()