What's The Difference Between High Quality 2.0 & Standard?

DuckingOutstanding said:

It's already probably been said but the answer to that question is highly subjective and will be likely to very widely depending on who you ask.

IMO it is a grossly overused descriptor Used by marketplace sellers to enhance the effectiveness of their listing, and in the context cuz most such listings that you might find on SEO clerks or Fiverr, it means little to nothing. The bargain basement sellers (typically from third world countries) typically equate high quality with high DA PA, and the quality control usually stops there.

That that being said, I would say the standard Web 2.0 would be just your bare bones Web 2.0 property such as weedly, wordpress, blogger, etc with one article and a link as well as perhaps a profile picture cooked into it.

High quality Web 2.0 on the other hand, would look much more like a full-fledged money site website it would contain multiple postings, all on the same topic of course that are full of actual valuable content and very well written in formatted with images and videos where appropriatea contact page for complete native citation information, privacy policy, gdpr, terms of service, a fully completed profile, linked social media accounts (minimum 2) and and about page with substantial content about the "author" (in this case a believable pen name). In other words anyone coming across the site would not be immediately suspicious of it being anything other than a legitimate site...

Hope that helps

Click to expand...

johnny79 said:

Excellent thanks very much "contact page for complete native citation" would that mean a real address & nap or fictional?

Click to expand...

UninvitedSoul said:

You want quality? Learn scraping.

You guys say metrics mean shit? Metrics help you filter millions and millions of results, to be able to go through thousands manually. Through the marvelous work of metrics, I came across gems like these:

View attachment 146214

View attachment 146215

Now, tell me, if you're going to put quality content on a Web 2.0, wouldn't you rather start off with something this good?
I've found even better stuff than these... I'm too lazy to dig deeper into my old files.

Don't expect to get massive quality for $5... we all know that in SEO. If you put in the work yourself, you can scrape gems with relevant backlinks in your own niche. You can also find Web 2.0's that were specifically created for your own niche.

It would take you days to come across, but if you really want it, it exists.
It's a fun task.
Do it yourself, instead of piling shit over sellers here and on Fiverr.

Wherever you're buying something related to SEO, make sure to ask the right questions when approaching the seller. You won't be scammed this way, and the system protecting whichever platform you bought through will help you either get what you asked for or get a refund.

If you're ignorant, don't blame others.

Click to expand...