What is the correct anchor diversity?

davids355

Super Moderator
Moderator
Executive VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
19,848
Reaction score
28,295
Obviously anchor text diversity is important now, and I've read loads of studies/experiments etc, but just wondering what the generally agreed percentages are in terms of direct keyword/generic/brand/long tail etc??
 
When I've looked at competitors, I don't really see them using generic anchors, though they do include many LSI keywords.
 
There's no such fixed amount of anchor diversity since there are many more factors which it depends on such as what type of links are you building and are they manually built or using automated tools?
 
I know there is know fixed amount. Just wondering what people are using.
im working on 20-30% keyword, and 70 % generic/lsi/brand, just wondering if anyone else has similar ideas.
 
I am always trying to keep keyword + raw urls(with keywords) density lower than 20-30%. The rest are generic anchors (40-50%) and LSI keywords(20-30%). But that depends on niche.
 
I am always trying to keep keyword + raw urls(with keywords) density lower than 20-30%. The rest are generic anchors (40-50%) and LSI keywords(20-30%). But that depends on niche.


Thanks mate, thats good, Ill stick to that model.
 
Matt Cutts is a fucktard and I suggest the majority to be raw urls of random structure and as little of keywords as you can.
 
A simple way I find is:
20% anchor text
20% LSI
20% URL
20% business name
20% read more/click here etc
 
sometimes i use misspelled anchor text

seems to add more naturalness to profile overall
 
I went into depth on this and all the diversity metrics in these videos:

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/499970-understanding-link-building-diversity-anchor-text-profiles-post-penguin-videos.html

...there is a breakdown of what's in each video below the top post.
 
The one that your top competitors are using :)

But I always go for ~50% urls + site name. And very important IMHO, instead of blasting the shit out of it using the keywords you are targeting, use a dictiorary and grab some synonyms.

Obviously anchor text diversity is important now, and I've read loads of studies/experiments etc, but just wondering what the generally agreed percentages are in terms of direct keyword/generic/brand/long tail etc??
 
What you need to do is, take the first ten position sites, go to majesticseo and ahrefs, analyse all the ten websites, check what the percentage they going for, and work towards it.

My general rule is
80 percent links goes to, brand, url, lsi and junk
And 20 percent anchor text distributed round the keywords.
Goodluck and happy new year
 
For the search term you want to get ranked for, run the top 5 through ahrefs and investigate the anchors of their backlinks for the proper percentages for keyword, long tails, generic and naked url.
 
Twice as long as the distance from one end to the middle. Why?

Because that answer can be applied to your question too. :)

But if you want a more conclusive answer, there are two:

1. TEST - nothing works better than what works for you.
2. IT VARIES - depending on the site/niche/competition, you may get away with more fishy stuff than you would otherwise. Or you may be on a way shorter leash than you would normally. Which brings us back to answer #1. :)
 
Back
Top