I'm really starting to believe that panda is hunting affiliate sites.
I'm beginning to suspect this as well.
I'm really starting to believe that panda is hunting affiliate sites.
Really? They have the search engine data, Chrome data, toolbars data, etc. etc.There's NO WAY for google to measure your bounce rate.
Can we please stop passing misinformation on how bounce rate is factored in with Panda....
There's NO WAY for google to measure your bounce rate. Even if they did, the sites with better bounce rates do not correlate with high rankings.
Even if they did, the sites with better bounce rates do not correlate with high rankings.
The only thing that I can think of is that Google may be on to autoblogging and punishing it. So it would look unnatural to have a site updated exactly every 2 days, whereas a human would update randomly.
I don't know if this is related, but my sites with the lowest bounce rates have all jumped up in the SERPs.
I'm beginning to suspect this as well.
Don't forget - "no monetization" (affiliate, adsense, etc.)Unique cms
Unique content
Unique design
Everyday quality backlinks
fuck... i would have to spend 1000$ on just setting up the site
Don't forget - "no monetization" (affiliate, adsense, etc.)![]()
some people says affiliates site are been canned alot, how about freebies site where 99% are full of affiliates links on it, they dont seem to get canned except one of my site.
Saying that, am been ranked higher up in some datacenters, cloaking or taging your affiliate as no follow dont seems to work in my case.
My competitors seems to be fine grrrrrrrr
Even if they did track bounce rate, BOUNCE RATE MAKES NO SENSE AS A MEASURE OF QUALITY!
If I google "when is Easter 2012" I am going to bounce as a satisfied searcher if you tell me.
If I google "when does elenin align closest to earth" I will bounce a satisfied user if you tell me.
If I google "best cranberry muffic recipe" I will bounce a satisfied user. I don't give a damn about your blueberry muffic recipe. I have cranberries to use up damnit, not blueberries. I will not click around your site. I'm going to make muffins now.
There are millions of search terms in which you should expect the user to bounce. There are millions of search terms where Google expects the reader to bounce. It just doesn't make any sense for it to be a universal search engine metric.
Is there something very wrong with this update? I saw a site that is in number 1 with just no followed comments backlinks. Did google forgot to on the comments backlink filter? I am seeing quite a few sites getting top positions with just comments backlinks in this update.