What is Panda after?

I have one site which survive all the panda update until the latest one. Traffic drop to more than half. I drop from position 2 to position 9 for my main keywords, while other keywords dropped 1 or 2 positions. Now ebay is occupying the top spot. I also saw that ebay is now in position 1 for most of the keyword I checked. I wonder if google is now giving more authority to ebay and ecommerce sites.
 
Can we please stop passing misinformation on how bounce rate is factored in with Panda....


There's NO WAY for google to measure your bounce rate. Even if they did, the sites with better bounce rates do not correlate with high rankings.

Even without google analytic, they can find out bounce rate from their search engine. Google cookied every search users. Let say someone do a keyword search and click on your site listing on google. When he finds that the site is junk, he will certainly go back to google and click on another site. Google will be able to calculate the bounce rate of your site through this interaction.
 
Even if they did, the sites with better bounce rates do not correlate with high rankings.

Even if they did track bounce rate, BOUNCE RATE MAKES NO SENSE AS A MEASURE OF QUALITY!

If I google "when is Easter 2012" I am going to bounce as a satisfied searcher if you tell me.

If I google "when does elenin align closest to earth" I will bounce a satisfied user if you tell me.

If I google "best cranberry muffic recipe" I will bounce a satisfied user. I don't give a damn about your blueberry muffic recipe. I have cranberries to use up damnit, not blueberries. I will not click around your site. I'm going to make muffins now.

There are millions of search terms in which you should expect the user to bounce. There are millions of search terms where Google expects the reader to bounce. It just doesn't make any sense for it to be a universal search engine metric.
 
The only thing that I can think of is that Google may be on to autoblogging and punishing it. So it would look unnatural to have a site updated exactly every 2 days, whereas a human would update randomly.

I don't know if this is related, but my sites with the lowest bounce rates have all jumped up in the SERPs.


Seeing the same thing here.
 
One thing is certain. Even if Panda is wrong on same levels, we need to create better websites.

Unique content is not the best content out there. If you give the searcher the same thing as everyone out there, Google will soon realize (even if you have unique content - rewritten from somewhere) its users don't need you to rank, so it will penalize you.
 
Unique cms
Unique content
Unique design
Everyday quality backlinks

fuck... i would have to spend 1000$ on just setting up the site
 
Unique cms
Unique content
Unique design
Everyday quality backlinks

fuck... i would have to spend 1000$ on just setting up the site
Don't forget - "no monetization" (affiliate, adsense, etc.) :D
 
some people says affiliates site are been canned alot, how about freebies site where 99% are full of affiliates links on it, they dont seem to get canned except one of my site.

Saying that, am been ranked higher up in some datacenters, cloaking or taging your affiliate as no follow dont seems to work in my case.

My competitors seems to be fine grrrrrrrr

I echo what you say here. In one niche I operate I'm my own biggest affiliate so I don't use AFF codes and I had zero negative affect from this. Some sites actually gained some better rankings. I really think affiliate links got hammered here, cloaked or uncloaked.
 
I have unique content on my sites
I have many backlinks with authority and high pr home link
more than 5 years in the market
. gov. edu backlinks - pr4-pr8
daily update
little bounce
established

1. My site takes 5 years. Completely lost its position. Poor indexing, indexes wrong url. mydomain.com/index.h?? and mydomain.com/otherpage. ???

2. My site has 3 years, won position in some key words, lost in the most important.
B) Sites with not unique content gained position on mine and my competitors.
C) Tables with meaningless keywords are #1 and #2 spot

wait and wait
those who earned some money, we should expect to invest, are new rules of the game.
But let's get back to winning!
 
Even if they did track bounce rate, BOUNCE RATE MAKES NO SENSE AS A MEASURE OF QUALITY!

If I google "when is Easter 2012" I am going to bounce as a satisfied searcher if you tell me.

If I google "when does elenin align closest to earth" I will bounce a satisfied user if you tell me.

If I google "best cranberry muffic recipe" I will bounce a satisfied user. I don't give a damn about your blueberry muffic recipe. I have cranberries to use up damnit, not blueberries. I will not click around your site. I'm going to make muffins now.

There are millions of search terms in which you should expect the user to bounce. There are millions of search terms where Google expects the reader to bounce. It just doesn't make any sense for it to be a universal search engine metric.


This exactly. I am not going to search a site for information on something like " are bananas good for you" and find that information then search around for more info on other crap I wasn't even thinking about. IF google is using bounce rate as a factor that is a total joke. I have found some really good sites that answered my question fully so what did I do? I leave it satisfied with my answer. People saying bounce rate is a factor should throw that out the window. If anything if I was searching for something and that page didn't have info on it so im searching other pages of that site I would be more unsatisfied with that rather than if they would of just gave me the info right off the bat.
 
popbradley, according to Wikipedia, if you hit your browser's BACK button after 2-3 sec on the site... it's a "bounce" too.
Google gathers that information and on the next Panda update we're all f*cked ;)
 
I used unique content and high pr links and my ranks went down 4 days ago. But the same thing happened a month ago and after 7 days i got back up
 
Is there something very wrong with this update? I saw a site that is in number 1 with just no followed comments backlinks. Did google forgot to on the comments backlink filter? I am seeing quite a few sites getting top positions with just comments backlinks in this update.
 
Is there something very wrong with this update? I saw a site that is in number 1 with just no followed comments backlinks. Did google forgot to on the comments backlink filter? I am seeing quite a few sites getting top positions with just comments backlinks in this update.

EXACTLY what I'm seeing. I was like :eek: maybe we should fire up ScrapeBox again? I really hope this is a temporary situation that will be resolved soon...
 
Seems to be back to normal here after I took out all the clickbank affiliate links... they were nofollow and cloaked, but still... but I have 1 site with lots of affiliate links, not much content, about 6 months old, and it has risen to a level where it's getting the same traffic as my 5 year old site with lots of content.
 
Back
Top