what is 2018 Link Building Process ?

Alhafiz Co

Newbie
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am searching for 2018 link Building and White Hat Way so share your thoughts about 2018 Link Building
 
Honestly, I can't see it any different from 2013. High quality and diverse links that is it.
 
Hmm but i think seo change updates time to time

Like directories ETC Consider Spam... Web 2.0 not working so how can we say there is no changes in seo from last 4 years
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like directories ETC Consider Spam... Web 2.0 not working so how can we say there is no changes in seo from last 4 years

How is web 2.0s not working? How are directories considered as spam? I still rank ton of sites with web 2.0s and directories links. I have been using the same strategy since 2013.

It all depends on how quality where you post your links. If you still spam it with GSA SER + RankerX blindly then yes, things have changed.

Edit: grammar.
 
How is web 2.0s not working? How are directories considered as spam? I still rank ton of sites with web 2.0s and directories links. I have been using the same strategy since 2013.

It all depends on how quality where you post your links. If you still spam it with GSA SER + RankerX blindly then yes, things have changed.

Edit: grammar.
i try many time first of all there is no directory from which we can get multiple visitors with low Bounce Rate ... SO I am not satisfied from directories and web 2 and i cannot see any result from both platform so i dont know why but not working for me
 
Successful SEO always backed with quality back links i.e. no of unique external links with decent domain authority. Big G since 2000’s consider link building as one of the main ranking signal.

In a word link building priority always shifted from quantity to contextual & relevancy.
 
Link building used to be about just getting words on your site, throwing it up, and then buying or spamming links. The change is that Google genuinely cares now about your site metrics, the quality of your site, and how your links come together.

I was just saying on another thread diversity doesn't just mean different types of links, it's important to have it look as natural as possible by incorporating links in a systematically "unsystematic appearing way".

So many people do this

High End Links: 12345
Mid level Lijnks: 123
Low level Links: 1

Or vice versa. That looks suspicious as hell. Context is key, relevancy is key as the person above me said, but it matters in how it looks as an overall link strategy as well.
 
Thread Moved

I deleted your poll, too. It was utterly pointless.
 
Link building used to be about just getting words on your site, throwing it up, and then buying or spamming links. The change is that Google genuinely cares now about your site metrics, the quality of your site, and how your links come together.

I was just saying on another thread diversity doesn't just mean different types of links, it's important to have it look as natural as possible by incorporating links in a systematically "unsystematic appearing way".

So many people do this

High End Links: 12345
Mid level Lijnks: 123
Low level Links: 1

Or vice versa. That looks suspicious as hell. Context is key, relevancy is key as the person above me said, but it matters in how it looks as an overall link strategy as well.
Thanks for your nice answer
 
Honestly, I can't see it any different from 2013. High quality and diverse links that is it.
What about relevancy?? is it matter if i build diversity backlinks from high quality sites but not related to my website content?
 
Back
Top