1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Website at SuperPages?

Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by virtualgeorge, Jan 2, 2009.

  1. virtualgeorge

    virtualgeorge Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    156
    Has anyone tried optimizing a site hosted at superpages.com?

    I haven't looked at it much but they have their own cms so the pages have a weird extension but I suppose they must have something to convert to search engine friendly urls?

    I was asked to work on a site there and it was a bit of pain to figure out their cms to edit the pages & tags & creating new pages.

    I am going to tell them I need to move the site to my server so its easier for me and I can use dreamweaver but wanted to give them some other reasons NOT to host there if anyone has a few that sound reasonable. I know they probably like the fact that they can login and edit the text but I was hoping to give them a good reason that seo will be improved if hosted elsewhere?

    They only have a one page site as it is so no big deal moving it.

    Thanks!
     
  2. Matt Cutts

    Matt Cutts Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    119
    get your own host. setup a nice autoblog network. That is the best.
     
  3. virtualgeorge

    virtualgeorge Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    156
    I already have my own hosting and will probably move this site to my server. This was just a web design client that wanted some seo done on his site. But I don't want to do it where it is hosted because the superpages cms is not user friendly and I don't want to take the time to figure it out for 1 client.
     
  4. jagrmeister721

    jagrmeister721 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    28
    Occupation:
    Doing stuff I love which makes me money
    Location:
    San Francisco
    >NOT to host there if anyone has a few that sound reasonable.

    I'm taking it this is a SMB we're talking about. Don't know much about it but I think one explanation could be given is that if they're interested in having the site maintained over the long-term, they don't want to be locked into some proprietary system, especially one that uses an odd CMS or extensions. What web master would want to maintain or develop that- it would require them to learn a whole new system. In the long-run they'll be paying more and probably getting less.