- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
Yeah, and are you waiting for an agreement or are they just load balancing your query? Think about it. P.s. ipfs is for files, not sc calls.
Web 3.0 is not like web2.0, why call it web3.0?
- Thread starter randomstrings
- Start date
AKQJ10
Regular Member
- Apr 25, 2017
- 336
- 241
I’ve updated my answer.
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
that’s your definition, not mine. I think either it should really be decentralised in every possible way, or.. meh..
Johnik
Regular Member
- Sep 3, 2019
- 330
- 418
You have an option to connect to your own node. So, stop talking shit about how not "decentralized" it is.
OccultKingdoms
BANNED
- Mar 11, 2013
- 5,542
- 9,750
Sorry foir going offtopic. Infura sounds like an adult network with really heavy stuff.
AKQJ10
Regular Member
- Apr 25, 2017
- 336
- 241
I didn’t create that definition. That’s how the whole Internet have been defining it. If you have a different definition for your web3, that’s fine. But then there’s no point to continue this argument.
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
Bruh, again… fucking understand how it works first. It does not matter what I think. For an end user, it is not decentralised. He is still speaking to a fucking server.
Show me, ser.
Johnik
Regular Member
- Sep 3, 2019
- 330
- 418
Of course, you are talking to a server, that's how the internet works. Clients ask servers for data... . With Web3 you can connect to YOUR node, so you are not connecting to a public compromised server...
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
AND THAT WAS MY FUCKING POINT. IT IS NOT TRUSTLESS. YOU ARE TRUSTING A SERVER.
Seriously, I am off guys.. I have work to do. Think whatever you want to lol.
Johnik
Regular Member
- Sep 3, 2019
- 330
- 418
did you even read my message or are you dumb? You can use your own web3 provider if you don't trust 3rd party service.
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
YOU DID NOT READ MY MESSAGE BRO. THE FUCKING END USER USES A DAPP. THEY ARE NOT A FUCKING WEB DEVELOPER. IT IS ABOUT THEM, AND NOT THE ADMINS.
getseoonline
Banned - Multiple Rules Violations
- Jun 5, 2012
- 1,563
- 826
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
Absolutely not bro. I am just learning. The real programmers make "wasm compilers" for example. They don't only use it lol.@Gogol mate you programming genius
getseoonline
Banned - Multiple Rules Violations
- Jun 5, 2012
- 1,563
- 826
mate you have any article to support this web 3.0 is not totally decentalized
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
Nopes sadly. I am still waiting for a js framework that can directly speak to the blockchain without using a provider, and waits for tx confirmation from the blockchain on write queries for example. I dunno if it is atall possible but hey..
KHer0
Elite Member
- Mar 22, 2011
- 2,465
- 2,981
Web 1.0 .. webmaster is the creator of the content
Web 2.0 .. Visitors is the creator of content, but there is a company that runs and owns the platform and most importantly monetize it. Like Facebook, youtube, twitter ..etc
Web 3.0 .. You take out the Corp from the operation. The creator of Web 2.0 content monetizes his content with the visitors directly. Content Creators create their media on blockchain and based on their popularity their coin value rises. It's revolutionary and everyone from the visitor can participate and get a share in the project. There is no single owner. You believe in a game, you hub in whether by investing money buying its coin, or by developing, publishing ..etc and getting your share.
To convert youtube into web 3.0 .. when you share, you earn coins, when you comment, you earn coins, when you upload video you get coins. So, everyone involved is getting his share based on his effort. No one owner is controlling the platform. Hope this makes sense
Web 2.0 .. Visitors is the creator of content, but there is a company that runs and owns the platform and most importantly monetize it. Like Facebook, youtube, twitter ..etc
Web 3.0 .. You take out the Corp from the operation. The creator of Web 2.0 content monetizes his content with the visitors directly. Content Creators create their media on blockchain and based on their popularity their coin value rises. It's revolutionary and everyone from the visitor can participate and get a share in the project. There is no single owner. You believe in a game, you hub in whether by investing money buying its coin, or by developing, publishing ..etc and getting your share.
To convert youtube into web 3.0 .. when you share, you earn coins, when you comment, you earn coins, when you upload video you get coins. So, everyone involved is getting his share based on his effort. No one owner is controlling the platform. Hope this makes sense
Johnik
Regular Member
- Sep 3, 2019
- 330
- 418
How more direct can the communication be, other than talking directly to a blockchain node? I don't really understand your thinking.
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
That’s the point man. I was never trying to say the “ideal solution” is missing. If you read my op again, I just said that what people think is decentralised isn’t really decentralised at the end of the day. We for example work with the same solution (not on ethereum or bsc though). My first statement was more theoretical than practical. You guys then jumped on me lol.
p.s. again, you are just talking to an api server that does the talking for you.
Johnik
Regular Member
- Sep 3, 2019
- 330
- 418
It seems you still do not understand. Ofc you are talking to an API server because that's how software communicates. The difference is with web3 you can talk to your own "gateway" (blockchain node) which is run by you, not a 3rd party. The blockchain node then connects to other peers, which is decentralized. This is not possible with web2.0 where all the servers are run by 3rd party like Google or Facebook.That’s the point man. I was never trying to say the “ideal solution” is missing. If you read my op again, I just said that what people think is decentralised isn’t really decentralised at the end of the day. We for example work with the same solution (not on ethereum or bsc though). My first statement was more theoretical than practical. You guys then jumped on me lol.
p.s. again, you are just talking to an api server that does the talking for you.
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,816
- 26,656
Ok, Lets say you are using a dapp for buying something. let’s say the api that replies you runs a full mode and it responds that a tx is done. How many servers said the tx is done? One? Or several? Let’s not worry about what’s going on in the backend. Just take the confirmation message.