web 2.0's vs private domain for pbn's

Bishal Bhandari

Junior Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
165
Reaction score
27
Guys i am trying to make some new pbn's but wanna ask shall i make it from expired / new web 2.0's or expired/new .com/.net etc's. As web 2.0's have very good DA fore most will it be better to make it or will the 2.0's like blogger , tumbler etc are outdated for pbn's p.s when should i link to my money website if i made a new pbn in a month or in 2 month thanks for the help in advance :) s
 
Web 2.0 will never be as strong as a well built PBN.

As for linking to your money site make it looks natural.
 
web 20s aren't as powerful as expired domains. Although they are pretty cheap compared to them (you only need to pay for content). If you can afford go with domain PBN, if not go with web 20s. It is that simple.
 
Web 2.0 not powerful.
I have 200 expired web 2.0 (DA 90 PA 29+) and have 100pbn (DA 20+, PA 20+).
And the result is, 100pbn better than 200 web 2.0.
 
If you can find web2.0s with decent trustflow at the PAGE level, not the domain level, then they will have value.
DA alone will not help you as you are just one page/subdomain of millions - might as well build profile links. Also most web2.0s only use an IP or two so you are not getting much diversity.
Personally I don't bother - expired/auction domains all the way please :)
 
Although expired web2.0's pack some nice juice, they are not as powerful as a top tld.
You can go with expired web2.0's as a foundation, especially if you keywords are easy. After that you can send some pbns, guest posts for the final push if needed.
 
I managed to rank a very-low competition keyword #1 with about 30 expired 2.0s and gsa ser mix, now the site gets 5K visitors a month and makes $10 a day. Only cost was $150 in proxies and metric checking. I tried the same thing on slightly higher competition and got to the top of page 2, needed to buy PBN links to get higher.
 
Backlinks from PBN expired domains are more powerful than the web2.0 sites. It is still better to have backlinks from them both
 
Both are important, but remember to also examine whether or not the backlink is do-follow/no-follow, as only do-follow backlinks will help to increase a site's rankings. In order for a site to rank well, it's important to get a variety of backlinks from different sources. The backlinks should be do-follow, on pages with high PA, contextual, and relevant.
 
A lot of crap here in this thread again.

Ok, so this question has been asked like 4879648657468 time in the past few months.

Expired web 2.0s or fresh web 2.0s for that matter will never be as strong as a standalone domain designed for PBN. The difference is not even close. Web 2.0s serve primarily for diversity. They will provide, especially expired ones, some boost, yes, but do not expect to rank anything half competitive with those, it simply won't happen.

When looking for expired web 2.0s, completely disregard idiotic DA/PA. With Tumblrs, look for the amount of d0follow backlinks and then TF. With any other web 2.0s, primarily look at the number of referring domains and then TF.

With expired domains it's a bit more complicated, they can be penalised or toxic and it requires a bit of experience to know which ones are good to use and which are not. There are a few guides online about this and you can also outsource it from people like me.

Also, building a PBN is XY times harder than just making a web 2.0. But XY times more rewarding.
 
We can't compare orange and apples. It depends on your competition.

I always use web2.0s and tiered link building.
It's worth than spending time on building PBNs
Spending $$$ lot of manual tasks.

I have multiple medium niches where i could manage rank along with web2.0s.

Give value to your audience it's more important than everything.
 
imo pbns should have some traffic and building traffic on a web is a waste

+ these web cms are really poor comparing to WP and yoast in seo
 
Back
Top