Most people here will tell you that WordAI produces the best spun content. For "one-click spinners," that's true. However, the quality still falls short of Tier 1 quality unless the original article was created with spinning in mind. Manual spinning remains the best method to generate unique articles. Spend a couple of hours generating a "super spun article" and you have enough content for your needs.
Of course. It's supposed to be slower because you're aiming for higher quality. I don't know if you own the tool but I see you mention it a lot in other threads. If so, I get that you want the name of the tool to be out in the open, but I doubt that it produces articles of the same quality as truly manually spun content. I've been doing it for years and no, I don't spend an awful lot of time spinning manually. Some of the most popular spinners on the market have handy features that make spinning much easier and faster. It's just that most people refuse to play with the settings and go spinning the way everybody else does.Manual spinning is much slower than spinning automatically. I have one user of CleverSpinner who used to spin articles manually and now he is doing it with the help of CleverSpinner. He is able to do the same job, with the same quality but much quicker. Even if an automatic spinner cuts down your spinning time 50% (it's usually much more), this at least doubles your productivity and it is much cheaper the hiring another person.
I wonder who pays people to post things like "dont use spun content, google can read text, buy expensive shit from fiver instead of using that money to buy top ranking software, preparing some spun and ranking in a month"
personally if i was to post my best working seo techniques on bhw they would be probably covered and forgotten by hilarious stuff like mentioned in this thread.