web 2.0 sites

[Geasy]

Are wordai articles good for tier 1 links?

And is it good to mix content, hand-written with spun (but readable) in a web 2.0?

 

[seohug]

Use it and sad to say, no. The spinning was never good in my opinion.
If you want Tier 1 to last, build like you would for a money site. If this is just a quick bank and rank operations, any Tier 1 garbage will do.

 

[MisterF]

I'd say avoid spun unless it was excellent stuff and then only use sparingly for inner pages.

 

[gary2]

As per my opinion, Don't use spun content on your Tier 1.Try to use unique content on your Tier 1 that will be effective.

 

[IgniteFirst]

Keep your tier1 links as clean as you can get. Go for handwritten content for the web 2.0s but if you're short on budget, use turing spinner option from wordAI, but make sure to manually go through the content and make edits.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

Another and much cheaper option is to use CleverSpinner to spin the T1 content. You do not really need hand written content, as the cost for lets say 20 articles will be $100, if you get WordAI it is around $50 per month I believe, while CleverSpinner is under $10 and even cheaper with coupon.

There is a free 3 trial so you have nothing to loose. The quality is similar to WordAI and the quality is pretty much the same at the moment, but CleverSpiner is constantly improving so the quality will be even better in future. If you need more than 3 days to test, or a discount coupon pm me.

 

[710fla]

I use SEO Content Machine to generate content. It scrapes Bing/Yahoo for articles and then combines paragraphs from each article into one. Then I use The Best Spinner to spin on the highest quality setting.

Before posting to web 2.0 I review the article, delete any weird sentences, and post it. All articles pass CopyScape.

When I first started out in SEO I hand-wrote all my articles. But it was extremely time consuming, so I started learning how to use the above tools. When scraping for articles, don't scrape Google, since all those articles are going to come back as duplicate if posted.

 

[honduran]

Best to not use spun content as you really want it to stick for as long as possible.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

But properly spun content is the same as it was written by a human, sounds good reads good, Can't hurt.

 

[vancleve]

Most people here will tell you that WordAI produces the best spun content. For "one-click spinners," that's true. However, the quality still falls short of Tier 1 quality unless the original article was created with spinning in mind. Manual spinning remains the best method to generate unique articles. Spend a couple of hours generating a "super spun article" and you have enough content for your needs.

 

[stevesolo]

You can use spun content for tier 1 links if it reads well and is unique.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

Most people here will tell you that WordAI produces the best spun content. For "one-click spinners," that's true. However, the quality still falls short of Tier 1 quality unless the original article was created with spinning in mind. Manual spinning remains the best method to generate unique articles. Spend a couple of hours generating a "super spun article" and you have enough content for your needs.

Manual spinning is much slower than spinning automatically. I have one user of CleverSpinner who used to spin articles manually and now he is doing it with the help of CleverSpinner. He is able to do the same job, with the same quality but much quicker. Even if an automatic spinner cuts down your spinning time 50% (it's usually much more), this at least doubles your productivity and it is much cheaper the hiring another person.

 

[minhftw]

My coworker just told me about Article Forge, mix with WordAI. I'm not sure if that's a good idea or not. Can you use these two on $$$ sites or T1?

 

[vancleve]

Manual spinning is much slower than spinning automatically. I have one user of CleverSpinner who used to spin articles manually and now he is doing it with the help of CleverSpinner. He is able to do the same job, with the same quality but much quicker. Even if an automatic spinner cuts down your spinning time 50% (it's usually much more), this at least doubles your productivity and it is much cheaper the hiring another person.

Of course. It's supposed to be slower because you're aiming for higher quality. I don't know if you own the tool but I see you mention it a lot in other threads. If so, I get that you want the name of the tool to be out in the open, but I doubt that it produces articles of the same quality as truly manually spun content. I've been doing it for years and no, I don't spend an awful lot of time spinning manually. Some of the most popular spinners on the market have handy features that make spinning much easier and faster. It's just that most people refuse to play with the settings and go spinning the way everybody else does.

 

[IMTopgun]

I don't use spun content on tier 1s at all. I don't do churn and burn these days so I want my tier ones to last longer if possible. By building them similar to my money sites I give both a better chance to succeed.

 

[David Jones]

unique and hand written article is far better now a days dont use spun article.

 

[blueprinthat]

I think it is better to use webarchive to get that content. Expireddomains net will help you to find domains for that.
There are some websites from where you can take 10-20 articles in 10 minutes. Spinning may be okay too, but it depends on black/white niche

 

[aidenhera]

I wonder who pays people to post things like "dont use spun content, google can read text, buy expensive shit from fiver instead of using that money to buy top ranking software, preparing some spun and ranking in a month"

personally if i was to post my best working seo techniques on bhw they would be probably covered and forgotten by hilarious stuff like mentioned in this thread.

 

[Tunenchi]

I've used WordAi for a while now, and I'd recommend Turing spinner and a little personal edit. It should work, however I also use Articleforge and don't mind the articles however at times, you can have a bunch of unrelated stuff in a paragraph or two, really needs you at the end of the day.

So if writing your own works, then that's great. If you can spin and edit for tier 1 for a quality article that's not so bad. However, spun content is favorable for tier 2 and 3.

 

[blueprinthat]

I wonder who pays people to post things like "dont use spun content, google can read text, buy expensive shit from fiver instead of using that money to buy top ranking software, preparing some spun and ranking in a month"

personally if i was to post my best working seo techniques on bhw they would be probably covered and forgotten by hilarious stuff like mentioned in this thread.

I partly agree because using unique freelance content for 100 of web 2.0 is a bs idea but spun articles are not always indexed well + web 2.0 at all are hard to index
Btw, how do you index web 2.0? Especially those one which are in profiles not subdomains?