[Very Small Case Study] Comparing the 4 main plagiarism checkers ✅

It's a shame, instead of SmallSEOTools, if there was 1 text, I think it would be a real top test. Although this is also excellently arranged.
Quetext is a really good plagiarism tool, but I always use Grammarly and 1 text to be safe.
Some writers on the forum only use Copyscape, which is a big mistake.
Thanks for this test
 
English is not my main language. So using Grammarly is handy, and I think one of the best investments I have made so far since maybe 2016. Next in the rank is quillbot
 
@PHPInjected Thank you a ton for this useful study. I was using copyscape for years and now after seeing your results I have decide to switch to Quetext.

Thanks to @MisterF too :)
 
One of the most powerful plagiarism checkers out there is 1 TXT.

The problem with them is they catch so much content that you run the risk of basically not being able to write anything.

Grammarly, Copyscape, and Quetext are pretty solid in my book.

But for the most part, if you're looking for just "the industry standard", Copyscape premium is pretty much the name of the game.

Quetext is definitely establishing a reputation for itself, but it's not quite there yet.

I do agree with you that Quetext does bring a lot more utility to the table when it comes to comparing plagiarized sentences.

The big downside with Copyscape is contextual.

Meaning, since it just focuses on three word strings in detecting plagiarism, you only need to change one of those three words in that string for it to pass that text.

It goes without saying that Copyscape premium is fairly easy to work around.

Quetext is more demanding and I believe that it should be the industry standard.

It is not quite there yet but it'll probably be the standard sooner rather than later.
 
One of the most powerful plagiarism checkers out there is 1 TXT.

The problem with them is they catch so much content that you run the risk of basically not being able to write anything.

Grammarly, Copyscape, and Quetext are pretty solid in my book.

But for the most part, if you're looking for just "the industry standard", Copyscape premium is pretty much the name of the game.

Quetext is definitely establishing a reputation for itself, but it's not quite there yet.

I do agree with you that Quetext does bring a lot more utility to the table when it comes to comparing plagiarized sentences.

The big downside with Copyscape is contextual.

Meaning, since it just focuses on three word strings in detecting plagiarism, you only need to change one of those three words in that string for it to pass that text.

It goes without saying that Copyscape premium is fairly easy to work around.

Quetext is more demanding and I believe that it should be the industry standard.

It is not quite there yet but it'll probably be the standard sooner rather than later.

False positives are definitely a small issue with 1TXT, QueText, and sometimes Grammarly as well. I say small because I've had QueText bring up a number of sentence fragments that aren't even in the same niche as mine but the sentences were somewhat similar.

I prefer QueText UI currently, but could see myself using 1TXT if I really had to. Copyscape was something I swore by for years and it seems like they haven't updated their detection algo in a long time.

I agree with you about Quetext becoming industry standard.
 
Thanks for sharing this case study @PHPInjected

Which of these plagiarism checkers have API access?

QueText doesn’t I believe. There’s a page online from 2019 that says they currently don’t. Grammarly does have beta access api. Even if copyscape had an api, I wouldn’t suggest using it.
 
premium or free?

1Text has free options and at the time of the study allowed me to check the plagiarism of 3 articles at roughly 700-1200 words per article. I believe the usage limits are reset every 24 hours. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Otherwise, There are 3 options for PRO-account:

  • Basic – 50 thousand symbols per day;
  • Standard - 100 thousand symbols per day;
  • Premium - 150 thousand symbols per day.
 
1Text has free options and at the time of the study allowed me to check the plagiarism of 3 articles at roughly 700-1200 words per article. I believe the usage limits are reset every 24 hours. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Otherwise, There are 3 options for PRO-account:

  • Basic – 50 thousand symbols per day;
  • Standard - 100 thousand symbols per day;
  • Premium - 150 thousand symbols per day.
I can’t seem to find the price model for that.

Second, do you have an idea what does the symbols represent? Symbols is equal to?
 
I can’t seem to find the price model for that.

Second, do you have an idea what does the symbols represent? Symbols is equal to?

1. https://1text.com/pack

2.
About FREE-package
When user registers and confirms the e-mail, they get free package of 15 000 symbols, it is possible to use them for checks without limits.
Please, note! You can use the package only once. If you do not have Free package in your account, in means that someone has already used it from your IP. All the possible bonuses and the price of the services are described on the page of the PRO-account.

PRO-packages
PRO-packages different in size and price. The bigger package, the lower price for 1000 symbols. When you buy a package that you choose by a size you can use fast paid checks on the tariff Speed.
Checks will be limited only by the number of symbols left in the PRO-package without taking time into account.
The maximum size of a text to check is 100 000 symbols.
You can see the amount of symbols left that an authorized user has at the top of the website in “My symbols”.
The history of withdrawal of paid symbols for all your checks is available on the page Usage history.
The results of checks are available on the page «Text Archive».
Unregistered user can check 5000 symbols per day for free. The limit for the registered user is higher - 15 000 symbols per day. To check a text over 15 000 symbols you need to buy PRO-package or upgrade to PRO-account.


I imagine a symbol equates to a letter. Though, I enjoyed the results I received from 1text.
 
1. https://1text.com/pack

2.
About FREE-package
When user registers and confirms the e-mail, they get free package of 15 000 symbols, it is possible to use them for checks without limits.
Please, note! You can use the package only once. If you do not have Free package in your account, in means that someone has already used it from your IP. All the possible bonuses and the price of the services are described on the page of the PRO-account.

PRO-packages
PRO-packages different in size and price. The bigger package, the lower price for 1000 symbols. When you buy a package that you choose by a size you can use fast paid checks on the tariff Speed.
Checks will be limited only by the number of symbols left in the PRO-package without taking time into account.
The maximum size of a text to check is 100 000 symbols.
You can see the amount of symbols left that an authorized user has at the top of the website in “My symbols”.
The history of withdrawal of paid symbols for all your checks is available on the page Usage history.
The results of checks are available on the page «Text Archive».
Unregistered user can check 5000 symbols per day for free. The limit for the registered user is higher - 15 000 symbols per day. To check a text over 15 000 symbols you need to buy PRO-package or upgrade to PRO-account.


I imagine a symbol equates to a letter. Though, I enjoyed the results I received from 1text.
Oh ok. Thank you. It would have been way better if one symbol is equal to 1 word.
 
Oh ok. Thank you. It would have been way better if one symbol is equal to 1 word.

That’d be a hell of a deal. However, I don’t know if you read the whole thread but my 1text test is here: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/v...giarism-checkers.1427806/page-2#post-15507877

I remember having to erase 3-400 words because I was beyond their symbol limit. I was able to run 3100 words for free through their checker. So the daily limit is somewhere in that range.
 
That’d be a hell of a deal. However, I don’t know if you read the whole thread but my 1text test is here: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/v...giarism-checkers.1427806/page-2#post-15507877

I remember having to erase 3-400 words because I was beyond their symbol limit. I was able to run 3100 words for free through their checker. So the daily limit is somewhere in that range.
Yes, I read it. Thank you very much for your time. If 1text is the best, then it deserves to be purchased.
 
Yes, I read it. Thank you very much for your time. If 1text is the best, then it deserves to be purchased.

I don’t know if it’s “the best” but it’s definitely up there. I preferred QueText over everything else, but copyscape was definitely useless.

Anyways, good luck.
 
hey thanks op! that's hell of an eye opener for me I must say. There are thousands of content creators on BHW who guarantees "100% copyscape pass" but now I believe this has to be changed looking at your case study. I am not sure if you have had any study done with SurferSEO inbuilt plagiarism check on its accuracy as it gives unlimited checks (with some waiting of 90 seconds) and costs nothing additional for that tool specifically.
 
A Great case study in side by side for 4 more tools I was looking for the best tools among them though I'm using Copyscape for more than 5 Years with Grammarly was think to move and more advanced one an if have the pro feature that I'ma completely rarely I think quetext this tools.
 
1text is also able to detect spun content, making it the best plagiarism checker out there.
 
Back
Top