Undetecatable.ai Scam?

CrispyChips

CrispyChips

Power Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
532
Reaction score
246
Lol. Just see these screenshots and figure yourself out. These can't be trusted at all.

#1 screenshot - same content, logged in

1719347128908.png

#2 screenshot - same content, not logged in

1719347258605.png
What other tool tells if the content is written using AI?

This is going to be tough.
 
Advertise on BHW
Well, first of all.. they are meant to 'bypass ai detectors' not to tell if your content was AI generated. Anyway.

Stay away & don't trust any AI detector tools are they are built on datasets of CONTENT and are most certainly innacurate.

Focus on making your content readable to the human eye and not boring rather than 'bypass ai detectors' oriented.
 
CrispyChips said:
That's the thing. For the same piece of content, it shows 2 different results.
Click to expand...
Yea, all of the AI 'bypass' and 'detector' tools are scam. Well more or less. They work but not as people expect it.

Anyway. IMO stay away.
 
They're all pretty mediocre, but if you need it, you're better off picking the best of them
Try crossplag, copyleaks or quetext
 
try gptzero one more thing was these ai detectors are useless you can get human score by just using simple line after article was written "give prompt: make this article easy to read and can easily readbale by 8- 10 year olds." and check the content see the magic.
 
All of these services use various AI models to modify your content. They are "undetectable" only because the AI detectors you use are not familiar with this or that particular model used by these services. Or maybe you think there are people on the other side editing your texts by hand? ;)

An advice: don't spend your money on them. Learn to write proper prompts instead.
 
Don't waste your time trying to check, just do some touch-ups and leave.
 
AI detectors are fake, a scam people still fallin over and is funny to see how they always contradict every time.
 
MoonStarz said:
AI detectors are fake, a scam people still fallin over and is funny to see how they always contradict every time.
Click to expand...

Hahaha. I just paid once and feel like asking for a refund now.
 
Even OpenAI failed at making a reliable classifier for AI written text. If OpenAI failed, I'm skeptical about the reliability of the others.

You can read about it here: https://openai.com/index/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text/

Limitations​

Our classifier has a number of important limitations. It should not be used as a primary decision-making tool, but instead as a complement to other methods of determining the source of a piece of text.
  1. The classifier is very unreliable on short texts (below 1,000 characters). Even longer texts are sometimes incorrectly labeled by the classifier.
  2. Sometimes human-written text will be incorrectly but confidently labeled as AI-written by our classifier.
  3. We recommend using the classifier only for English text. It performs significantly worse in other languages and it is unreliable on code.
  4. Text that is very predictable cannot be reliably identified. For example, it is impossible to predict whether a list of the first 1,000 prime numbers was written by AI or humans, because the correct answer is always the same.
  5. AI-written text can be edited to evade the classifier. Classifiers like ours can be updated and retrained based on successful attacks, but it is unclear whether detection has an advantage in the long-term.
  6. Classifiers based on neural networks are known to be poorly calibrated outside of their training data. For inputs that are very different from text in our training set, the classifier is sometimes extremely confident in a wrong prediction.
 
originality.ai has been able to detect it almost everytime
 
AlekhyaDas said:
originality.ai has been able to detect it almost everytime
Click to expand...

It's 100% fake and can be easily fooled by asking the AI model to generate content in the style of a clumsy or overly complex author. Don't forget the presence penalty and top p values, because they are important.
 
CrispyChips said:
Lol. Just see these screenshots and figure yourself out. These can't be trusted at all.

#1 screenshot - same content, logged in

View attachment 355487

#2 screenshot - same content, not logged in

View attachment 355489
What other tool tells if the content is written using AI?

This is going to be tough.
Click to expand...
my ai detector script:

$i = mt_rand(0,1);
if($i){echo "AI detected!";}else{echo "AI not detected!";}
 
CrispyChips said:
Lol. Just see these screenshots and figure yourself out. These can't be trusted at all.

#1 screenshot - same content, logged in

View attachment 355487

#2 screenshot - same content, not logged in

View attachment 355489
What other tool tells if the content is written using AI?

This is going to be tough.
Click to expand...
AI detector and bypass tools are scams. End of story.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top