Undetecatable.ai Scam?

[CrispyChips]

Lol. Just see these screenshots and figure yourself out. These can't be trusted at all.

#1 screenshot - same content, logged in



#2 screenshot - same content, not logged in


What other tool tells if the content is written using AI?

This is going to be tough.

 

[samaranight]

Well, first of all.. they are meant to 'bypass ai detectors' not to tell if your content was AI generated. Anyway.

Stay away & don't trust any AI detector tools are they are built on datasets of CONTENT and are most certainly innacurate.

Focus on making your content readable to the human eye and not boring rather than 'bypass ai detectors' oriented.

 

[CrispyChips]

bypass ai detectors

That's the thing. For the same piece of content, it shows 2 different results.

 

[samaranight]

That's the thing. For the same piece of content, it shows 2 different results.

Yea, all of the AI 'bypass' and 'detector' tools are scam. Well more or less. They work but not as people expect it.

Anyway. IMO stay away.

 

[alonelywriter]

They are all Fake. None of them Actually Detects anything.

 

[KingMasterEg]

Try stealthwriter

 

[SEO Puffin]

Is there Plagarism checker help about it?

 

[Thiagobr]

zerogpt works for me

 

[AnthonyJn]

They're all pretty mediocre, but if you need it, you're better off picking the best of them
Try crossplag, copyleaks or quetext

 

[Tipblog]

try gptzero one more thing was these ai detectors are useless you can get human score by just using simple line after article was written "give prompt: make this article easy to read and can easily readbale by 8- 10 year olds." and check the content see the magic.

 

[flackz]

All of these services use various AI models to modify your content. They are "undetectable" only because the AI detectors you use are not familiar with this or that particular model used by these services. Or maybe you think there are people on the other side editing your texts by hand?

An advice: don't spend your money on them. Learn to write proper prompts instead.

 

[medialounge]

Don't waste your time trying to check, just do some touch-ups and leave.

 

[MoonStarz]

AI detectors are fake, a scam people still fallin over and is funny to see how they always contradict every time.

 

[CrispyChips]

AI detectors are fake, a scam people still fallin over and is funny to see how they always contradict every time.

Hahaha. I just paid once and feel like asking for a refund now.

 

[Nora94]

I don't believe them. I think fake.

 

[s4nt0s]

Even OpenAI failed at making a reliable classifier for AI written text. If OpenAI failed, I'm skeptical about the reliability of the others.

You can read about it here: https://openai.com/index/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text/

Limitations​

Our classifier has a number of important limitations. It should not be used as a primary decision-making tool, but instead as a complement to other methods of determining the source of a piece of text.

1. The classifier is very unreliable on short texts (below 1,000 characters). Even longer texts are sometimes incorrectly labeled by the classifier.
2. Sometimes human-written text will be incorrectly but confidently labeled as AI-written by our classifier.
3. We recommend using the classifier only for English text. It performs significantly worse in other languages and it is unreliable on code.
4. Text that is very predictable cannot be reliably identified. For example, it is impossible to predict whether a list of the first 1,000 prime numbers was written by AI or humans, because the correct answer is always the same.
5. AI-written text can be edited to evade the classifier. Classifiers like ours can be updated and retrained based on successful attacks, but it is unclear whether detection has an advantage in the long-term.
6. Classifiers based on neural networks are known to be poorly calibrated outside of their training data. For inputs that are very different from text in our training set, the classifier is sometimes extremely confident in a wrong prediction.

 

[AlekhyaDas]

originality.ai has been able to detect it almost everytime

 

[flackz]

originality.ai has been able to detect it almost everytime

It's 100% fake and can be easily fooled by asking the AI model to generate content in the style of a clumsy or overly complex author. Don't forget the presence penalty and top p values, because they are important.

 

[DarkerAds]

Lol. Just see these screenshots and figure yourself out. These can't be trusted at all.

#1 screenshot - same content, logged in

View attachment 355487

#2 screenshot - same content, not logged in

View attachment 355489
What other tool tells if the content is written using AI?

This is going to be tough.

my ai detector script:

$i = mt_rand(0,1);
if($i){echo "AI detected!";}else{echo "AI not detected!";}

 

[Nikolaos]

Lol. Just see these screenshots and figure yourself out. These can't be trusted at all.

#1 screenshot - same content, logged in

View attachment 355487

#2 screenshot - same content, not logged in

View attachment 355489
What other tool tells if the content is written using AI?

This is going to be tough.

AI detector and bypass tools are scams. End of story.