jjgg89
Regular Member
- Jan 10, 2016
- 392
- 47
is it not?What makes you think they're loosening restrictions?
is it not?What makes you think they're loosening restrictions?
I'm going with 350/day at the moment and seems to be safe. Will start to unfollow and see what happens before increasing that number.
In my experience now:What is the delay between each follow?
Complete bans, not just locks? How old were the accounts?Got 12 accounts banned 2 days ago.
mix between following 30-70, 200-400, and 600-700
delays 30-70, 45-80, 35-55
pausing accounts for a little while.
Got 12 accounts banned 2 days ago.
mix between following 30-70, 200-400, and 600-700
delays 30-70, 45-80, 35-55
pausing accounts for a little while.
Complete bans, not just locks? How old were the accounts?
you didn't have access to the sms re-verify correct?
im still getting locked even though its not EVERY time it's close but that's because i follow/unfollow
however, im always only locked once and nothing happens after that. adding 500-1000. unfollowing 200-500.
Maybe they also lowered the number of accounts per proxy to 2-3 because this is a pretty clear indicator for spam/bots.They were suspended, not locked. Had to email them was able to get a few back. Few were from May 2015 and some were basically brand new.
Had groups of 4 accounts to each proxy and they all got suspended, so something must of triggered something. They been running on same proxy since made and only ever slowly increase follow/unfollowing. When they got suspended I havent messed with the account in about month so it was weird.
They were suspended, not locked. Had to email them was able to get a few back. Few were from May 2015 and some were basically brand new.
Had groups of 4 accounts to each proxy and they all got suspended, so something must of triggered something. They been running on same proxy since made and only ever slowly increase follow/unfollowing. When they got suspended I havent messed with the account in about month so it was weird.
Maybe they also lowered the number of accounts per proxy to 2-3 because this is a pretty clear indicator for spam/bots.
That doesn't add up unless you can bend the time. lolIn my experience now:
350 followers - 5 minutes delay
Yea, I know. That was an estimated average number. Haven't calculated it. I don't always follow 350 with an delay of 5 minutes but it shows that it sucks.That doesn't add up unless you can bend the time. lol
With that delay you follow 12 users per hour, 12 x 24 = 288/day.![]()
tweeting with links?To be honest everyone there does not seem to be a pattern - it just seems like they are at Red Alert. On Friday I have over 400 accounts SMS lock and I had to unlock them. Turning the FL settings back on means I risk that happening again. They were only tweeting.
So.... I guess we just have to ride it out.
Yes, it's just too slow to bother with.Yea, I know. That was an estimated average number. Haven't calculated it. I don't always follow 350 with an delay of 5 minutes but it shows that it sucks.
Maybe they also lowered the number of accounts per proxy to 2-3 because this is a pretty clear indicator for spam/bots.
Were the 4 accounts all running at the same time?
The thing about this is if you walk into a library you can often see 100+ computers all connected using the same IP address. You'd get people logging in and out of Twitter all the time, so they must look for a pattern of some sort.
If you use Follow Liker you can set it so that X accounts use the same proxy, HOWEVER, they don't use them at the same time. So you can use 3 accounts on the same proxy but it only logs into account 2, once account 1 has done it's tasks.
This to me looks a more sensible way, rather than having accounts all following/unfollowing at the same time using the same proxy. I'd probably limit it to 3 accounts though, which still gives each account 8 hours per day.