Good question , been researching this space a lot myself.
All three are decent but they solve slightly different problems. TrustCloaker and Cloaking House are more focused on the cloaking side (hiding your real LP from reviewers). PeerClick is really a tracker first, cloaking second.
What I'd suggest: don't just look at cloaking. The real game changer for FB is traffic filtering quality. Most bans don't come from bad cloaking, they come from low quality traffic patterns that trigger FB's algorithms. If your tool can filter out suspicious clicks before they even reach your page, you're in a much better spot.
Things I'd check before choosing:
- Bot detection accuracy (ask for stats if they have them)
- Redirect speed (test it yourself, don't trust their marketing)
- How often they update against FB's detection methods
- Whether they offer IP/ISP level filtering
I've been building my own filtering setup for gambling campaigns in EU markets and the difference between a basic cloaker and proper traffic filtering is night and day. Let me know what vertical you're in and I can give more specific advice.
