Digital Lead
BANNED
- Jan 5, 2016
- 847
- 109
i checked my site's url TF and CF using majestic and both is 30 which means its equal. Is this bad?
Trust Flow and Citation Flow
- Thread starter Digital Lead
- Start date
3bisu
Elite Member
- Nov 29, 2014
- 2,249
- 1,061
No, is good
- Jan 20, 2013
- 9,383
- 1,014
It's good and you can also try to increase TF of your site,it will help you in better ranking.
Last edited:
phpbuilt
Account compromised December 2025
- May 16, 2011
- 1,865
- 5,369
How much $ does the site make? If $0 ... then it's bad. If $1000+, then great.
Digital Lead
BANNED
- Jan 5, 2016
- 847
- 109
Hi im appreciate for your reply. But what i read is about the higher of TF, the more reliable and good backlinks you have there..And there is trust ratio calculation between TF and CF..CF should not be higher than TF. But if both are equal then is ok? Don't really understand on thisNo, is good
Digital Lead
BANNED
- Jan 5, 2016
- 847
- 109
haha,my high volume of keywords are yet to be on page 1. So yea my site don't make even a cent yet
Joseph Lich
BANNED
- Nov 25, 2015
- 401
- 79
TF>>CF is a good sign.
Digital Lead
BANNED
- Jan 5, 2016
- 847
- 109
But is equal now
sanaskalid
Newbie
- Feb 16, 2016
- 19
- 4
It's nice TF, get more CF or Tf links to increase your site.
Joseph Lich
BANNED
- Nov 25, 2015
- 401
- 79
TF>CF Good
TF=CF Less Good
TF<CF Links ingredients contains some sort of shitty ones. Avoid.
TF=CF Less Good
TF<CF Links ingredients contains some sort of shitty ones. Avoid.
Angry Old Man
Registered Member
- Aug 24, 2016
- 52
- 8
It also matters how many links that metric is composed of. If the PBN has one link coming to it then it's not so good. Incoming link type and metrics are almost more important than the main metric of the site.
- Apr 25, 2011
- 19,849
- 28,315
TF basically shows how near your site is to influential "seed tf" sites. So if your main topical trust flow was for computers, then a tf seed site might be techcrunch.com (just an example).
So if you had a link from TechCrunch then you would likely have a very high TF. Which of course would be good - it really means your site is considered very relevant in your niche.
CF is the power that your back links have. So again with a link from TechCrunch you'd have high tf and high cf and it would be good.
If you have links from a load of spammy sites that have perhaps had their metrics manipulated then you would probably get a high cf for the powerful links but a low tf because your site would not be anywhere near the neighbourhoods of any genuinely authoritive sites. That's why tf<cf is bad, because a)there is no clear topical trust flow for your site (ie no one influential in your niche thinks it's any good) and b) it highlights that you are possibly trying to manipulate your metrics with spammy / generic links.
So if you had a link from TechCrunch then you would likely have a very high TF. Which of course would be good - it really means your site is considered very relevant in your niche.
CF is the power that your back links have. So again with a link from TechCrunch you'd have high tf and high cf and it would be good.
If you have links from a load of spammy sites that have perhaps had their metrics manipulated then you would probably get a high cf for the powerful links but a low tf because your site would not be anywhere near the neighbourhoods of any genuinely authoritive sites. That's why tf<cf is bad, because a)there is no clear topical trust flow for your site (ie no one influential in your niche thinks it's any good) and b) it highlights that you are possibly trying to manipulate your metrics with spammy / generic links.
- Jun 25, 2015
- 4,006
- 861
Yeah, the metrics are good. To increase the metrics, keep building links and share your links to the social media. If you get more traffic the site trust flow will increase according to the citation.
Best of luck.
Best of luck.
Joseph Lich
BANNED
- Nov 25, 2015
- 401
- 79
It's your money website? Very good to be honest. I thought it was pbn site.