Trust Flow and Citation Flow

[Digital Lead]

i checked my site's url TF and CF using majestic and both is 30 which means its equal. Is this bad?

 

[3bisu]

i checked my site's url TF and CF using majestic and both is 30 which means its equal. Is this bad?

No, is good

 

[iAuthority]

It's good and you can also try to increase TF of your site,it will help you in better ranking.

 

[Monsterer]

It is a nice metrics try to improve it more..

 

[phpbuilt]

i checked my site's url TF and CF using majestic and both is 30 which means its equal. Is this bad?

How much $ does the site make? If $0 ... then it's bad. If $1000+, then great.

 

[7th Sense]

It's good mate. It's bad only if the differnce between them is high

 

[Digital Lead]

No, is good

Hi im appreciate for your reply. But what i read is about the higher of TF, the more reliable and good backlinks you have there..And there is trust ratio calculation between TF and CF..CF should not be higher than TF. But if both are equal then is ok? Don't really understand on this

 

[Digital Lead]

How much $ does the site make? If $0 ... then it's bad. If $1000+, then great.

haha,my high volume of keywords are yet to be on page 1. So yea my site don't make even a cent yet

 

[Joseph Lich]

TF>>CF is a good sign.

 

[Digital Lead]

TF>>CF is a good sign.

But is equal now

 

[sanaskalid]

It's nice TF, get more CF or Tf links to increase your site.

 

[Joseph Lich]

TF>CF Good
TF=CF Less Good
TF<CF Links ingredients contains some sort of shitty ones. Avoid.

 

[Angry Old Man]

It also matters how many links that metric is composed of. If the PBN has one link coming to it then it's not so good. Incoming link type and metrics are almost more important than the main metric of the site.

 

[Titans]

It's good. Try to increase your TF.

 

[davids355]

TF basically shows how near your site is to influential "seed tf" sites. So if your main topical trust flow was for computers, then a tf seed site might be techcrunch.com (just an example).

So if you had a link from TechCrunch then you would likely have a very high TF. Which of course would be good - it really means your site is considered very relevant in your niche.

CF is the power that your back links have. So again with a link from TechCrunch you'd have high tf and high cf and it would be good.

If you have links from a load of spammy sites that have perhaps had their metrics manipulated then you would probably get a high cf for the powerful links but a low tf because your site would not be anywhere near the neighbourhoods of any genuinely authoritive sites. That's why tf<cf is bad, because a)there is no clear topical trust flow for your site (ie no one influential in your niche thinks it's any good) and b) it highlights that you are possibly trying to manipulate your metrics with spammy / generic links.

 

[W9go]

thats a very good metrics ........ especially if this was created natural.

 

[BlackShield]

Yeah, the metrics are good. To increase the metrics, keep building links and share your links to the social media. If you get more traffic the site trust flow will increase according to the citation.
Best of luck.

 

[djp371]

No, the only bad sign is when CF is too high than your TF.

 

[JasonS]

It's good man, now you've a good chance for the sponsored guest posts to earn some handy cash

 

[Joseph Lich]

It's your money website? Very good to be honest. I thought it was pbn site.