the best harvester: scrapebox vs hrefer?

I

iamok22

Regular Member

Dec 24, 2009

298

4

• Feb 25, 2010

• #1

well...it is simple.

if you know both of them ...which is the best harvester in your opinion and why?

 

I

iamok22

Regular Member

Dec 24, 2009

298

4

• Feb 26, 2010
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #2

anybody?

 

I

iamok22

Regular Member

Dec 24, 2009

298

4

• Feb 27, 2010
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #3

anybody experienced with these 2 softwares?

 

K

kandor

Regular Member

May 26, 2008

274

100

• Feb 27, 2010

• #4

I have both

Hrefer supports more threads.
I can run it with 500 threads if I have enough good proxies.

Also there is possibility to make the queries a bit more customized.

So I would give hrefer the plus in its harvesting part.

Best regards,
Kandor

 

dirtbag

BANNED

Jul 24, 2008

990

534

• Feb 27, 2010

• #5

I have both, if you're looking to make your choice based strictly on their scraping ability, Hrefer is superior.

 

E

e-service

Regular Member

Mar 1, 2009

447

110

• Mar 3, 2010

• #6

I used scrapebox , it so good. This is first time I heard about Hrefer, what's it ? where I can buy it?

thanks!

 

insider

Regular Member

Jul 5, 2009

382

145

• Mar 3, 2010

• #7

Scrapebox => 1 footprints x N words
Hrefer => N footprints x N words

Plus Hrefer has filtering capabilities.

So, hrefer

 

E

e-service

Regular Member

Mar 1, 2009

447

110

• Mar 3, 2010

• #8

can you tell me where I can buy Hrefer?

thanks!

 

E

emthree

Junior Member

Aug 8, 2009

114

12

• Mar 3, 2010

• #9

I hope scrapebox multithreads its harvesting capabilities soon

 

insider

Regular Member

Jul 5, 2009

382

145

• Mar 3, 2010

• #10

e-service said:

can you tell me where I can buy Hrefer?

Click to expand...

http://www.botmasternet.com/product16453/

 

N

nathanooo2

Registered Member

Feb 3, 2010

95

1

• Mar 3, 2010

• #11

I have not used hrefr so far.I am doing well with scrapbox.I like it.

 

D

dapapst

Newbie

Feb 1, 2010

19

2

• Mar 3, 2010

• #12

hrefer is an addon product for xrumer...

So 500$ for hrefer and 40$ or whatever for scrapebox....

 

E

e-service

Regular Member

Mar 1, 2009

447

110

• Mar 3, 2010

• #13

OMG, that Xrumer ,

I used scrapebox and it is great tool

 

Sweetfunny

Elite Member

Jr. VIP

Jul 13, 2008

2,219

5,431

• Mar 3, 2010

• #14

emthree said:

I hope scrapebox multithreads its harvesting capabilities soon

Click to expand...

You will be happy to know, almost there...

http://i45.tinypic.com/kbdhs1.png

That's pulling down 229 URL's per second with 2 engines and 10 threads per engine. With the new multi-threading fully running on all engines pulling over a million URL's per hour should be trivial. I guess if you run it on a server and had enough proxies to feed it, you could run 10 instances for 10 million an hour.

 

C

cdc515

Power Member

Nov 23, 2009

604

95

• Mar 3, 2010

• #15

you should add the option to input multiple footprints as well as multiple keywords

 

W

wickid12

Regular Member

Dec 4, 2009

363

37

• Mar 3, 2010

• #16

Hrefer isn't that good to use with xrumer because more than 60% of the links return the error "no post sending forms found".

 

I

iamok22

Regular Member

Dec 24, 2009

298

4

• Mar 4, 2010
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #17

dotaplaya said:

Hrefer isn't that good to use with xrumer because more than 60% of the links return the error "no post sending forms found".

Click to expand...

do you suggest any alternative?

 

insider

Regular Member

Jul 5, 2009

382

145

• Mar 7, 2010

• #18

Hrefer isn't that good to use with xrumer because more than 60% of the links return the error "no post sending forms found".

Click to expand...

It's all about YOUR footprints and filters, it's not hrefer fault. I you use more strict/targeted filters/footprints you'll have a much better success rate

 

C

centurytuna

Newbie

Jul 21, 2010

27

1

• May 5, 2011

• #19

is there any other alternative for hrefer and scrapebox?

 

J

jb2008

Senior Member

Jul 15, 2010

1,158

976

• May 5, 2011

• #20

Not really. It's recommended to get both, SB for general SEO purposes. I now use hrefer for most harvesting but I've done a LOT with SB in the past too.