the best harvester: scrapebox vs hrefer?

iamok22

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
298
Reaction score
4
well...it is simple.

if you know both of them ...which is the best harvester in your opinion and why?
 
anybody experienced with these 2 softwares?
 
I have both

Hrefer supports more threads.
I can run it with 500 threads if I have enough good proxies.

Also there is possibility to make the queries a bit more customized.

So I would give hrefer the plus in its harvesting part.

Best regards,
Kandor
 
I have both, if you're looking to make your choice based strictly on their scraping ability, Hrefer is superior.
 
I used scrapebox , it so good. This is first time I heard about Hrefer, what's it ? where I can buy it?

thanks!
 
Scrapebox => 1 footprints x N words
Hrefer => N footprints x N words

Plus Hrefer has filtering capabilities.

So, hrefer :-)
 
I hope scrapebox multithreads its harvesting capabilities soon
 
I have not used hrefr so far.I am doing well with scrapbox.I like it.
 
hrefer is an addon product for xrumer...

So 500$ for hrefer and 40$ or whatever for scrapebox....
 
I hope scrapebox multithreads its harvesting capabilities soon

You will be happy to know, almost there...

http://i45.tinypic.com/kbdhs1.png

That's pulling down 229 URL's per second with 2 engines and 10 threads per engine. With the new multi-threading fully running on all engines pulling over a million URL's per hour should be trivial. I guess if you run it on a server and had enough proxies to feed it, you could run 10 instances for 10 million an hour.
 
you should add the option to input multiple footprints as well as multiple keywords
 
Hrefer isn't that good to use with xrumer because more than 60% of the links return the error "no post sending forms found".
 
Hrefer isn't that good to use with xrumer because more than 60% of the links return the error "no post sending forms found".

do you suggest any alternative?
 
Hrefer isn't that good to use with xrumer because more than 60% of the links return the error "no post sending forms found".

It's all about YOUR footprints and filters, it's not hrefer fault. I you use more strict/targeted filters/footprints you'll have a much better success rate
 
Not really. It's recommended to get both, SB for general SEO purposes. I now use hrefer for most harvesting but I've done a LOT with SB in the past too.
 
Back
Top