Testing 3 fanpages over 60 days.

Alexander (Alex) said:

What if the content I present remains highly engaging and sparks curiosity?


That goes without saying, but I want to emphasize that all three of those pages are new.


Look, that’s just my opinion, and I want to ask everyone if it’s actually true or not.


That might be the case.


So, could you tell me which type of review is the most reliable?


What is the most accurate way to evaluate effectiveness?


If text-based posts are performing three times better than image-based posts, would you stop designing images altogether?


That's right; I ran the test and got this result.


Can you explain why that is the case?


That depends on each person's goals; I am simply sharing my own assessments and experiences, although I honestly don't know why the results turned out the way they did.)))


That is why I am asking you—to get the most accurate information and confirm whether my thinking is actually correct.


Since this was a test, I kept all those common factors constant—including the posting times—in order to arrive at that assessment.

Click to expand...