Alexander (Alex)
BANNED
- Jul 10, 2026
- 10
- 10
I tested three Facebook pages over a 60-day period and found that short posts performed two to three times better than image-based posts; does anyone know why?
You cannot judge your own content as good, because that depends on the opinions of the viewers.What if the content I present remains highly engaging and sparks curiosity?
Although they are new websites, their target audiences differ; therefore, what you say holds true only in certain specific cases.That goes without saying, but I want to emphasize that all three of those pages are new.
That's right, my friend.Although they are new websites, their target audiences differ; therefore, what you say holds true only in certain specific cases.
Of course this is the case, unless you have a clear and short CTA (call to action).That might be the case.
I'm not entirely sure either, but there doesn't seem to be any specific metric for those things.That is why I am asking you—to get the most accurate information and confirm whether my thinking is actually correct.
If text-based posts are performing three times better than image-based posts, would you stop designing images altogether?
that is fascinating but very logical. small messages are easier to read nd would allow people to comment or react to them with less effort. however i would also conssider the issue of the topic nd the timing of ur post. this could make a lot of difference. u have a good pattern over three pages in 60 days.I tested three Facebook pages over a 60-day period and found that short posts performed two to three times better than image-based posts; does anyone know why?