Run-on-Top
Junior Member
- May 18, 2009
- 104
- 28
Syndk8 - SerpScraper 2.0 - Review|Discussion
Hi,
i bought SerpScraper 2.0 from Syndik8 to test and compare it with outer harvesters i also have (scrapebox, hrefer, scrapegenius) and wont give a little review here on BHW.
First i want to say, iam a advanced harvester user, i have multiple (about 30) privat paid proxies and "enough" footprints for all kind of script and software out there to be able to make a review on that kind of software.
I started with Serpscraper last 2 days and tested it with some Keywords:
.
My conclusion:
The scraper is worth the money (Yeah you hear right!!!), but only for the bonus functions other scrapers doesn't have!
Goods
Thanks Button if this review gives you a little help.
Hi,
i bought SerpScraper 2.0 from Syndik8 to test and compare it with outer harvesters i also have (scrapebox, hrefer, scrapegenius) and wont give a little review here on BHW.
First i want to say, iam a advanced harvester user, i have multiple (about 30) privat paid proxies and "enough" footprints for all kind of script and software out there to be able to make a review on that kind of software.
I started with Serpscraper last 2 days and tested it with some Keywords:
- Footprint: "Powered by Pligg" ; Additional Words: nothing > Google.com (Hits by Google: 6,720,000) ; Results: 170 scraped URLs!!!
- Footprint: "Powered by Pligg" ; Additional Words: 5 well distinguishable Words (Finance,Sports,Insurance,Wellness,Food), so it would harvest "powered by Pligg"+Finance as one query and so on > Google.com (Hits by Google in summary: 6,149,600) ; Results bye serpscraper: 481 scraped URLs!!!, after remove duplicate hosts 290 URLs!!!
- Footprint: "Powered by Pligg" ; Additional Words: 5 well distinguishable Words (Finance,Sports,Insurance,Wellness,Food) > Bing.com: 0 Results [maybe i was to lazy to fix the broken bing.xml, but for a new software i could expect a running bing.xml]
- Footprint: "Powered by Pligg" ; Additional Words: 5 well distinguishable Words (Finance,Sports,Insurance,Wellness,Food) > Yahoo.com:0 Results [maybe i was to lazy to fix the broken yahoo.xml, but for a new software i could expect a running yahoo.xml]
- Footprint: "Powered by Pligg" ; Additional Words: 5 well distinguishable Words (Finance,Sports,Insurance,Wellness,Food) >
- Yandex.com: 50 results scraped
My conclusion:
The scraper is worth the money (Yeah you hear right!!!), but only for the bonus functions other scrapers doesn't have!
Goods
- That means you can build your own searchengine xml for every searchengine out there and harvest from it, thats a Big Plus,
- and you can check URL-Lists for Footprints on the page with Serpscraper, thats also a big plus.
- [TLD-Filter, Remove Duplicate Hosts or URls, trim to root, Sort or Slpitt Lists, Remove 404 (dead urls) are standard and all the other scrapers have it to, no plus!]
- Its a god damn bad scraper! I tested it out cause i want to scrape more than 1000 results on a single query (cause my favorite harvester scrapebox only search 1000 maximum for one query), what i get was a little tool harvesting the first 2 pages on every query, nothing more. On my Defintion this is not a Scraper! Sure you can harvest 100.000 Urls (also with serpscraper) with a good additional wordlist, but why? with the same queries i get 1.000.000 if i use scrapebox or 500.000 if i use scrapegenius.
- No support
- Scrapebox (with a BIGBIG Gap)
- Scrapegenius and Hrefer
- SerpScraper (also ok cause of the additional or special features)
Thanks Button if this review gives you a little help.
Last edited: