JuggernautJukey
BANNED
- Dec 10, 2013
- 528
- 227
I still don't understand how people can get away with it. Isn't it something that moderators enforce?
We all know the definition of Blackhat, and most know the definition of White Hat .. So why do all these blackhat services get away with calling them white hat? Even the most well known service providers are guilty of it.
I can't count on 2 hands the amount of times I have clicked a 'Completely White Hat Links' bla bla bla thread, just to see more directory submissions, web 2.0 posts, PBN links and all the other blackhat techniques.
'Manually Built' does not make a service white hat, no matter how you word it.
Am I just nit picking, or does anyone else think they shouldn't be allowed to advertise as white hat, when they clearly aren't?
We all know the definition of Blackhat, and most know the definition of White Hat .. So why do all these blackhat services get away with calling them white hat? Even the most well known service providers are guilty of it.
I can't count on 2 hands the amount of times I have clicked a 'Completely White Hat Links' bla bla bla thread, just to see more directory submissions, web 2.0 posts, PBN links and all the other blackhat techniques.
'Manually Built' does not make a service white hat, no matter how you word it.
Am I just nit picking, or does anyone else think they shouldn't be allowed to advertise as white hat, when they clearly aren't?