DutchTrafficService
Regular Member
- Aug 12, 2010
- 473
- 235
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
You are the one being clueless here, and without knowing what you are talking about.
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
It's young site only a couple months old, but it's PR3 with only quality links point at it. The first tier web 2.0 has all original content with several posts on each web 2.0, all other first tier links are quality links from within my niche. I did spam the web 2.0's but it was done through mega huge pyramids 3-4 tier using SENuke.
I beg to differ. You, sir, are on some epic bullshit. Good luck with ranking your de-optimized sites, removing almost every keyword, and removing all your links. Don't worry Dutch Traffic Service, people will build links to your sites naturally because they think the content it's super cool, no need to use any tools to make money. LOLYou are the one being clueless here, and without knowing what you are talking about.
Yes, you are right. The high volume keywords are the 3% being targeted as that's where the big spammers go - the big money keywords.2-3% keyword density might be a bit higher.. (anything around 1.5 is good). However too much is being said about keyword density which is not true, and some great and exceptional articles might have higher keywords. Google will not hammer a site just for a keyword density of 2-3, which happens naturally even in some top sites. Google is focusing a lot on keywords having higher searches, because that is where the money is being made both for google and the sites that are ranking. IMO this might have to do more with the overall quality of your site.
You're not the only one. Same thing happened to me, as well as others. I've seen people asking this same question on this forum and others. It's no coincidence that lots of people lost rankings at the exact same time.
I had a penalized site 301'd to my new one (stupid I know). I'm pointing the finger at that blunder of mine. My on-page is good, kw density is in-between 1-2%. Very diverse anchors and sources, blogs, profiles, edu, web 2.0, wikis, social, etc. New blog posts every day.
I removed the 301 and hopefully the next "update" will be a favorable one. Just think ahead to when we finally get a good grasp of EVERY do and don't of seo. Stay hungry!
at least the advance link building part.In there it says something about the number of links should be built on a monthly basis is multiplied by the number of visitor you are getting;like you are getting 10 visitors a day then the number of links should be build 10*30=300 links a month.I think its a good idea after those recent updates & also keeping the link velocity at the same pace as well.
Guys i don't know what happened with OP site but i would suggest everyone to check the following video - at least the advance link building part.In there it says something about the number of links should be built on a monthly basis is multiplied by the number of visitor you are getting;like you are getting 10 visitors a day then the number of links should be build 10*30=300 links a month.I think its a good idea after those recent updates & also keeping the link velocity at the same pace as well.
My personal belief is that as soon as a site does well in google serps for high value keywords, then it gets a manual review
Lol dude good luck ranking with 0.1% keyword density ha ha ha
Please don't spread shit around if you know nothing about SEO or regurgitate BS from noobs. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
To the OP - did you get negative SEOed? What major changes did you make prior to the drop?
You are the one being clueless here, and without knowing what you are talking about.
Did you know, if you don't have the keyword in the article even once, still you can rank for it?
Occurrence of 20 same keywords in the same article, oh well, may be possible if you are writing on some specific topic...(There are something called as pronouns, that can be used instead of a noun, while referring them several times in the article) but hey, you are screwed if you do the same in all 200 articles on your website. Does that look natural?Google isn't a fool, that can't spot this bullshit.
I only disliked how you told OP that he got dropped because of his measly 2% KW density which is utterly false. The repetition of 20 words in a 1000 article is completely natural. Take a look at all the #1 Wikipedia articles.