1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Single Post Web 2.0 vs Super Web 2.0

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by zoewarrior, Sep 17, 2014.

  1. zoewarrior

    zoewarrior Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2010
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Asia
    Hi BH members

    Any of you can share your experience using either single post web 2.0 or super web 2.0 in ranking your site? Are there any differences in terms of ranking boost between two of them? I have built super web 2.0 manually just a few days ago. So far each of them has between 2 and 3 posts. I have not added any link to the money site. But one of them have been removed by the moderator so far. The quality of article is good.

    I am wondering why use so much time to build super web 2.0 which you have no control over. In terms of ROI, it looks like single post web 2.0 fares better. If it is deleted, I can build it again in no time, not worrying about the additional articles that I need to post to over time.

    So guys does it really matter if your web 2.0 only has one post? Will it provide the same ranking power as super web 2.0? Do additional posts to web 2.0 add extra link juice? I am more concerned about its ranking boost.
     
  2. algorre

    algorre Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    17
    I'm using "super" ones but the only difference between a "super and a "one post" is about 10 minutes of work, the problem is most of your "one post" will not look natural and might also get deleted by the web 2.0 moderators.

    I have never used one post 2.0 but the "super" are efficiently boosting my SERPS rankings. I always do quality over quantity but that is my opinion.

    If you want a nice guide to help you to increase your efficiency in creating those quality web 2.0, I can advice you this guide from Theseo
    -> http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...-guide-art-super-web-2-0-creation-2014-a.html
     
  3. zoewarrior

    zoewarrior Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2010
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Asia
    Hi Algorre

    I have read that thread. Since you are using super web 2.0, how significant is the SERP boost? Have you tried on various keywords in different niches? For example if you have 20 super web 2.0 pointing to your money site, how many jumps in SERPs on average do you see?
     
  4. seobpachica

    seobpachica Junior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    SEO/Web dev
    Location:
    Matt Cutts neighborhood
    Home Page:
    Making a single post web 2.0 is good but it is much better if you maintained the web 2.0 properties you made. Having quality contents and making the linkings more natural like embeded with trusted/authority sites on the post by not all links on the properties will go to your site to make it more natural. Updating the themes/titles and also the blog page would one of the best things should be done to make the properties on its best.
     
  5. bignose

    bignose Power Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    90
    Gender:
    Male
    Web 2.0 property is still not your asset unlike a normal website, but already much better than only a single post on web 2.0. Common sense.
     
  6. algorre

    algorre Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    17
    I haven't made that many, but I've done 3 for my website and in the mean time I was building other kind of links. I can see the 2.0 linking to my website in webmaster tools.
    I'm ranking on the second page for a low competition keywords and on the page 9 for a medium-high in my country but I couldn't say exactly how much only 2.0 push the rankings because I'm using an high diversity of backlinks. Also is just the beginning of my campaign so I will let you know more results later on :)
     
  7. SEO Power

    SEO Power Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    680
    Occupation:
    Self employed
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Don't think there's any difference between multi-page and one-page web 2.0s. Multi-page web 2.0 blogs last longer and evade the mods better, while one-page web 2.0 blogs are more prone to deletion.
     
  8. alternatesword

    alternatesword Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2,323
    Likes Received:
    484
    Location:
    scabbard
    Home Page:
    You can just use single post web2.0 with your website link and add tier 2 or you can make multiple post web2.0 with 2+ posts drip feed over time and include your website in 2nd or 3rd post and do the tier 2.
     
  9. zoewarrior

    zoewarrior Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2010
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Asia
    Do you see similar upward SERP movements with any one of them?

    Anyone else has personally seen significant SERP movements with 100s single post Web 2.0?
     
  10. zoewarrior

    zoewarrior Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2010
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Asia
    SEO Power, when you say there is no difference between both of them, are you saying both of them provide same SERP boost?

    Probably the only advantage super web 2.0 has over single post web 2.0 is it may survive longer when it comes to moderation. Yet, even when you add multiple posts, you will never know when your web 2.0 gets deleted. The moderators can be trigger happy at times. I can't figure out why they delete my account half way through even I have posted quality unique contents with any link to money site, changed the theme and created a nice about me page.
     
  11. zoewarrior

    zoewarrior Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2010
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Asia
    Algorre

    Since you have made super web 2.0, do you keep both money site and super web 2.0 closely related? For example, if your money site is about dog training, do you create dog training super web 2.0?

    What about you guys? Do you keep the theme both money site and super web 2.0 closely related? Have you tried a broader theme on super web 2.0? I mean instead of dog training, you build a general pet super web 2.0 to cover more money sites that are related to pets. If so, does it help in ranking?
     
  12. alternatesword

    alternatesword Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2,323
    Likes Received:
    484
    Location:
    scabbard
    Home Page:
    I've tried both, both working in different way. The second one will give more authority compare to the first one.