no, it's not! Spam score is a garbage metric invented by MOZ and google doesn't give a shit about it, please stop lying to people!
If the content history is clean (no niche changes / pharma / gambling / adult / warez / etc content) and the anchor texts are safe I think the domain is good and you should go for it.
I acquired the domain through the Wayback Machine, and it appears to have been an art gallery from an artist. It seems legitimate, and the niche has consistently been about art from the early 2000s until now, so I think it's fine.
It is recommended to review the quality of backlinks and make sure they are from credible websites.
I’ve already secured referring domains (RD) from high-quality and credible websites like Wikipedia, BBC, and others, which we know are authoritative sources.
The high spam score of 57-60% is a concern, as it suggests the domain may have been involved in harmful practices that could negatively impact your SEO. Even though the referring domains seem good, you should carefully review the quality of the backlinks to ensure they aren’t spammy. While it’s good that the domain is still indexed and getting traffic, the high spam score could lead to future penalties from Google. If you're confident you can clean up the spammy elements like toxic backlinks, the domain might be worth it. Otherwise, it could be a risky investment for your SEO efforts.
That’s the issue. I haven’t found any sketchy or harmful content or practices on the site, and the backlinks seem fine—nothing appears spammy. However, I’m unsure why the spam score is still really high.
Spam score doesn't matter much. You can consider checking the content quality, relevancy, anchor texts, backlink quality, traffic & ranking fluctuations, etc. If you find anything suspicious you can go for the alternate one.
The domain ranks in the top 3 for 1 keyword, and the traffic has been consistent. That’s why I like this domain.
I usually ignore spam score and DA
Some people say that a spam score over 10 is a red flag, while others think it’s not a big deal.
I have sold 500+ aged domains for Indonesia and Thailand gambling projects, and I have been monitored performance of EVERY domain I have sold, let me share some insights here:
----
What DOES NOT matter;
1). Domain Spam score
2). Spam anchor text
3). Whether the domain has 301 redirect history (except it was 301 redirected to gambling/porn sites)
What DOES matter:
1). Whether it was abused by other gambling/porn sites, check this in wayback machine.
2). Whether has backlinks from authority sites.
3). Whether has organic traffic, not must, but preferred.
4). Restaurant/Food domain works best for ID/TH gambling projects, but other niche domains work as well.
----
Hope this helpful.
yesss...
I always check to ensure that the domain hasn’t been abused by other gambling sites, but this one appears clear. It has credible referring domains like Wikipedia, BBC, Yahoo, and many with 80+ or 90+ Domain Ratings (DR). I also checked the Wayback Machine and found that it was previously an art gallery of an artist, so I think it's fine.