sharing my experience using bmd for a month

cindarearth

Newbie
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
here i want to share my experience using BMD for a month
first i want to share the lack of this application, i don't know whether this only happened to me or to others too

1. low successful rate for everytime submission (50%)
2. low successful rate for submitting the same site for the second time (30%)
3. sometimes the pligg sites contained some viruses

and the redundancies of this application

fast indexed (that's it)

i hate point 2, maybe someone here can help me to solve the problem in point two.


thanks
 
remark : bmd=bookmarkingdemon ;)
what are better options ? because then we do such fast tool the errors are expected to be like this. then you i use a program of 20 sites then it will 90 % success !
 
BMD is pretty decent for bookmarking, but you have to accept that the majority of pligg/scuttle sites that
are out there are of such low quality and so heavily spammed that any benefit is going to be negligable.
Not to mention that you can add a thousand new sites to it's list of websites and 25% of them may be shut
down and not be working within a week. That's just the nature of the beast.

And no there is no way to really increase the resubmission success rate. Some sites simply don't allow a URL
to be bookmarked twice. Try bookmarking another URL within your site.
 
I used to use autopligg all the time, it got me ranked in top 10 for most of the keywords I used. Even got me number 6 for 'cheap web design' once. But after a while it just didn't seem to work as well. I think its the same with BMD (although I haven't tried it). Sometimes I think Google figures out whats going on and weakens the effect of such techniques.
 
Yeah, I've had BMD for quite awhile now, and it's definitely lost a lot of its effectiveness.
 
Back
Top