Deco89
Registered Member
- Jan 24, 2013
- 67
- 6
It's overpriced because it's quality.
It's like comparing a honda to a bentley..
uhm okey, so if someone wants "worse" quality why not let them buy the cheaper alternative if they want?
It's overpriced because it's quality.
It's like comparing a honda to a bentley..
You are asking BHW (i.e., the system) to pick BST winners and losers in advance of these BST's entry into the marketplace, where winners and losers emerge organically.
If someone is cloning your BST and offering it for a cheaper price, but your BST is qualitatively better, don't you think the truth will out?
I just don't get it. Some of you seem to be arguing that shyte services are somehow doing damage when the fact of the matter is that they, like all shyte things in the market, eventually serve to highlight the qualitatively better options, thereby making the qualitatively better option providers more money over the medium- and long-term.
You missed my point buddy, I am not complaining about people offering low pricing, just about the "Quality" , and if someone is offering his service for a low price, it doesn't necessarily mean it's low quality.... I am just trying to improve the BST from "low quality" services, whether the price of the service is $10 or $1000.
You missed my point buddy, I am not complaining about people offering low pricing, just about the "Quality" , and if someone is offering his service for a low price, it doesn't necessarily mean it's low quality.... I am just trying to improve the BST from "low quality" services, whether the price of the service is $10 or $1000.
You missed my point buddy, I am not complaining about people offering low pricing, just about the "Quality" , and if someone is offering his service for a low price, it doesn't necessarily mean it's low quality.... I am just trying to improve the BST from "low quality" services, whether the price of the service is $10 or $1000.
Yeah I get your point, might not be as easy as suspected. I do have some ideas in mind for defining the quaity but it would be too time-consuming at this rate of level (many people opening BSTs).First things first, I agree that it would be nice if the BST section only had quality services
BUT
How do you propose we define the quality of a BST?
It would take months to gauge the effectiveness of an SEO service.
Some services will rank you fast, and than you will get hit by a Google update.
Other services will have no immediate effect, but work wonders in the long term.
It would be hard to monitor these things over time.
That being said, I don't think it is a bad thing that services are getting cheaper. Some businesses remain competitive because of their low prices, while others remain competitive because they offer a unique service (cost leaders and product leaders). That is just how business works. Interfere with that, and you are messing with the free market.
Price and quality are not always positively correlated.
Yeah I get your point, might not be as easy as suspected. I do have some ideas in mind for defining the quaity but it would be too time-consuming at this rate of level (many people opening BSTs).
We have no idea how many get denied everyday, so it's not as easy to judge...
i dont care about the whole discussion, BUT just one personal experienced fact as highly frequent BST buyer: one year ago i could be sure for 90% of my purchases i could be proud of the links i get PLUS it wil bring me huge ranking gains. Now is the time for fishy snake oil marketers, selling blog network posts as guest posts and so on... i reduced my purchases to one provider who i guess i can trust as all of the last months have been annoying and dissapointend at the end of the day. in the past purchasing here was fun, today it is dangerous for your site - independent from the price.
One year ago SEO was way different too though...