Djwillster123
Junior Member
- Nov 28, 2015
- 175
- 41
thanks for sharing man
Certainly enterprise won't use PBNs, they just have real money sites that they harness like PBNs.
For a dirty little example check Hearst Communications' site http://www.bestproducts.com. They have a fantastic PBN consisting of http://www.cosmopolitan.com, http://www.esquire.com, http://www.marieclaire.com, and others under the Hearst umbrella.
These are real money sites of course, in fact, they're full-on brands, but they are used just like PBNs to prop up bestproducts.com.
I'll only out them because there case has already been written about, but there are many others like it.
Have a peak at their silos, some pretty fantastic SEO going on.
Can anybody who understood the whole scheme can draw a diagram? or just a simple image to understand who is linking to whom? In my opinion it is so simple but i might be wrong.. It's better to show simple scheme than overcomplicate with bs terms etc..
![]()
Did anyone else test that in Google?
but doesnt this mean that one niche sites are the strongest?yes its not working
question one .. no ,,,question 2 ...yesbut doesnt this mean that one niche sites are the strongest?
root domain will always have the biggest potential than subfolder
question one .. no ,,,question 2 ...yes
hi.
I've been here where it was reported that you will not be able to test the transistor without my semantic kernels that are made by service http://levsha-instruments.ru/
I gave you this technology is for reference, to explain the principle of operation. Anything free does not happen.
This works in Google and Bing and Baidu, in any search engine. The principles on which the transistor is fundamental and can't change.
But with technology, I repeat, need my product. It makes ONLY I.
I wouldn't WA to talk about technology, if you could apply it for free.
Please contact me in Skype and talk about it.
yes its not working
You try to sell your service ... but do you have a current example of transistor pages ranking in google. show us.
first: the algorithms of Google and Yandex do not differ in their fundamental principles
second: why did you decide that you can use what technologies generally promote the site or page in TOP SERP?
Who told you such nonsense? You believe in fairy tales?
Remember:
Page moving to the TOP not by technology, but by means of them. It is a completely different concept.
If you're looking for a magic pill, you will always have to expect disappointment. You should be ashamed to have such a desire.
third: seo is not promoting the sites, but only increases the probability of growth. Are two levels different things. It is foolish not to understand this.
fourth: technology of the transistor-a technology minimize the cost of the references made, at maximum reference weight (efficiency of reference).
Nothing more from technology should not be expected.
If you want for$ 25 to create a link, which will benefit 150$, then you use the transistor technology.
No one promised you achieve Top SERP.
Yes, page rank is growing but the page did not take the obligations to get into the top