SEO relevancy amplifiying method [GIVEAWAY]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Certainly enterprise won't use PBNs, they just have real money sites that they harness like PBNs.

For a dirty little example check Hearst Communications' site http://www.bestproducts.com. They have a fantastic PBN consisting of http://www.cosmopolitan.com, http://www.esquire.com, http://www.marieclaire.com, and others under the Hearst umbrella.

These are real money sites of course, in fact, they're full-on brands, but they are used just like PBNs to prop up bestproducts.com.

I'll only out them because there case has already been written about, but there are many others like it.

Have a peak at their silos, some pretty fantastic SEO going on.


Actually BestProducts does all sorts of shady stuff... Look at their backlinks a few pages deep in ahrefs; tons fo guest book spam and weird chinese links... Looks like automated spam stuff generated with a tool like GSA to their money site... lol they are too powerful; organic traffic over a milllion and have tons and tons of good links from their other magazine sites.

Btw. Wirecutter started out the same way as well; as a writer for Gizmodo etc and got lots of high PR authority blogs to rank to his site.
 
Thread is not about big sites, but this method instead.. Anybody who started this test got any results???
 
Can anybody who understood the whole scheme can draw a diagram? or just a simple image to understand who is linking to whom? In my opinion it is so simple but i might be wrong.. It's better to show simple scheme than overcomplicate with bs terms etc..
e567a3f366a445fe8dee4e882bda9d75.png


i tried now 3 pair of transistor pages. they are up for 2 month ..... and the ranking did not change for the pages.
conclusion ......in google its NOT working. the mentioned level up of the pages because of the linking structure is not leveling up in google.
maybe in yandrix i did not check the ranking there.
 
Thank you guys for clearing things up, maybe this method is really bs..
 
Interested to see what other results people had. Definitely seen some similar workings in sports betting in Google before. Wasn't sure if they were hiding 100% of their PBNs, now I think they might be doing that and this strategy too.
 
question one .. no ,,,question 2 ...yes

question one=yes because our rootpage (any page) is targeting mainly just one single keyword=one niche

unless you target "motorbikes" that indeed can be multiniche
 
hi.
I've been here where it was reported that you will not be able to test the transistor without my semantic kernels that are made by service http://levsha-instruments.ru/
I gave you this technology is for reference, to explain the principle of operation. Anything free does not happen.
This works in Google and Bing and Baidu, in any search engine. The principles on which the transistor is fundamental and can't change.
But with technology, I repeat, need my product. It makes ONLY I.
I wouldn't WA to talk about technology, if you could apply it for free.
Please contact me in Skype and talk about it.
 
hi.
I've been here where it was reported that you will not be able to test the transistor without my semantic kernels that are made by service http://levsha-instruments.ru/
I gave you this technology is for reference, to explain the principle of operation. Anything free does not happen.
This works in Google and Bing and Baidu, in any search engine. The principles on which the transistor is fundamental and can't change.
But with technology, I repeat, need my product. It makes ONLY I.
I wouldn't WA to talk about technology, if you could apply it for free.
Please contact me in Skype and talk about it.


No true .... maybe you have the right semantic KW but the fundamental principe if this works or not is not depending on the semantic KW.
i made several transistor pages and they still rank nowhere - and thats now more than a half year. So level up is not working in google.

You try to sell your service ... but do you have a current example of transistor pages ranking in google. show us.
 
I already told you that without my product, you will not succeed.
Can make 100 transistors with the same result :)
But you don't listen.
 
yes its not working

You try to sell your service ... but do you have a current example of transistor pages ranking in google. show us.

first: the algorithms of Google and Yandex do not differ in their fundamental principles
second: why did you decide that you can use what technologies generally promote the site or page in TOP SERP?
Who told you such nonsense? You believe in fairy tales?
Remember:
Page moving to the TOP not by technology, but by means of them. It is a completely different concept.
If you're looking for a magic pill, you will always have to expect disappointment. You should be ashamed to have such a desire.
third: seo is not promoting the sites, but only increases the probability of growth. Are two different things. It is foolish not to understand this.
fourth: technology of the transistor-a technology minimize the cost of the references made, at maximum reference weight (efficiency of reference).
Nothing more from technology should not be expected.
If you want for$ 25 to create a link, which will benefit 150$, then you use the transistor technology.
No one promised you achieve Top SERP.
Yes, page rank is growing but the page did not take the obligations to get into the top
 
first: the algorithms of Google and Yandex do not differ in their fundamental principles
second: why did you decide that you can use what technologies generally promote the site or page in TOP SERP?
Who told you such nonsense? You believe in fairy tales?
Remember:
Page moving to the TOP not by technology, but by means of them. It is a completely different concept.
If you're looking for a magic pill, you will always have to expect disappointment. You should be ashamed to have such a desire.
third: seo is not promoting the sites, but only increases the probability of growth. Are two levels different things. It is foolish not to understand this.
fourth: technology of the transistor-a technology minimize the cost of the references made, at maximum reference weight (efficiency of reference).
Nothing more from technology should not be expected.
If you want for$ 25 to create a link, which will benefit 150$, then you use the transistor technology.
No one promised you achieve Top SERP.
Yes, page rank is growing but the page did not take the obligations to get into the top



i made the transistors on a page which is well ranked and was before .

i tracked the transistors and made them exactly according your posts and pictures .... the transistors never showed up in my rank tracker .... so the fundamental statement you say that if one is receiving and the other is giving and that levels both of them up is not working in Google.

So independent if you use the right semantic KW to maximise the link power ... which is the service you offer .... the main principe of your structure (the level up effect of the receiving and giving transitorpage) is not working. You can't even show an example with a ranked transistor page without links in Google ..... or a page which is ranked only be transistor pages....
 
I already told you.
Without the participation of my WebService is IMPOSSIBLE to make a working transistor.


I only describe the principle and all.
what fool would give the public a working technology?
To like you free get to use it? Without me? :)
No fools.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top