SENuke Questions Answered! - How I Use SENuke.

wonderful post dude. thanks..

Hi Yukinari,

Thanks for all of your posts, I've found this thread very helpful and I decided it'd be silly to not ask you for advice .

In order to get ranked for keywords with say under 10k allintitle and 70k phrase match, would the social network nuke + profile nuke alone be enough? I know it's a very broad question and can vary by keyword, but on average of those easier niche-y type keywords, will I be able to rank top 3 with just those?

Something I've been doing is simply mashing up a bunch of ezine articles on the same topic and spinning them + shortening the article so it averages around 300 words. The readability is not that great, but it's extremely easy. Is this a viable strategy?

Do you suggest doing a tiered structure with the social network nuke? What is the advantage of having multiple tiers as opposed to just having one tier? Simply for safety reasons?

Also, not be get off topic, but when is your next Clickbank Domination book coming out? There was originally a date and I wanted to get it asap before it sold out .

Thanks a lot!

edzwoo said:

Hi Yukinari,

Thanks for all of your posts, I've found this thread very helpful and I decided it'd be silly to not ask you for advice .

In order to get ranked for keywords with say under 10k allintitle and 70k phrase match, would the social network nuke + profile nuke alone be enough? I know it's a very broad question and can vary by keyword, but on average of those easier niche-y type keywords, will I be able to rank top 3 with just those?

Something I've been doing is simply mashing up a bunch of ezine articles on the same topic and spinning them + shortening the article so it averages around 300 words. The readability is not that great, but it's extremely easy. Is this a viable strategy?

Do you suggest doing a tiered structure with the social network nuke? What is the advantage of having multiple tiers as opposed to just having one tier? Simply for safety reasons?

Also, not be get off topic, but when is your next Clickbank Domination book coming out? There was originally a date and I wanted to get it asap before it sold out .

Thanks a lot!

Click to expand...

1. As you pointed out, that question is very broad and unfortunately I cannot give you a yes or no answer.

Searching for your KW in quotes and allintitle etc is a good way to get a feel of what's going on on a KW basis, but it is definitely not as important as it used to be.

What really matters is what is ranking on Google for your KW on page 1.

2. Mashing up articles, spinning, and then submitting them can be useful, but I would only use this for link bait.

3. Having multiple tiers can help your rankings, gives you more exposure, are great for backlinks....

4. CBD 3 got pushed back because I got the flu and was pretty much bed ridden all week. I am still not 100%, but I will be working on it this week. You will know when it's live.

Seems like question 1 was a bit of a stretch . That's okay I think I have a general idea of the keywords I'm targeting.

1. I'm not sure what the distribution is on the clicks from page 1 vs further up? I have many important keywords that are ranked on page 2, but is page 1 that much better unless it's above the fold?

2. Hm, you would only use this for link bait? I've been running this type of nuke on my ecommerce store's category page over and over again. Is this not a good idea to improve my rankings? I've had a boost in SERPs when I started, but now it doesn't seem to do much (my rankings seem to be settling around 12-20). What would you suggest to get that extra boost into page 1?

3. Sorry for not understanding this maybe, but my articles are generally very low quality (55%+ spun article mashed up and low readability). What I mean is, instead of having say tier 1 tier 2, why not just have all of your nukes as tier 1? I would imagine there's a diluting effect the lower you go. Also, I'm not sure but I don't think I get any direct traffic with my web 2.0 properties.

4. Hope you get better . I'll definitely be waiting for it.

I actually have a lot of questions to ask, and sorry if a lot of them might be trivial. I've read a lot of material but I have a bad habit of trying to remember it all.

I've built up a few sites now, started internet marketing about six months ago, starting to make some pocket money now, but it's taking a lot of my time to manage all the link building and content posting, so was thinking about getting SE nuke, I've just read this thread, the best thred I've read on here yet!

I think the best way to go, and probably for others who are on the way up like me is to get the $67 37 day trial, learn the program, see what it can do for yourself, use trail and error, then ultimately decide if it's worth the $127 price tag per month.

Unfortunately, Areeb and guys almost abandoned this cool software and working on X-Senuke only, at least I have this impression...
there are lots of complains in their forum too, because updates are not up-to-date anymore

Yes, senuke is pure junk nowadays, a total rip off since about 40% of the site in it work.

Better avoid this one until senuke X comes out, if it ever does

pretty much it.

Yukinari, when I first learned of SEnuke, I assumed that taking multiple listings on page one required the use of all of the web 2.0 properties. I am now somewhat more convinced that this is rarely attainable, but fortunately unnecessary.

Multiple rankings with "stronger" sites seems to be more feasible. I have seen sites like ezine and squidoo repeatedly ranking over the alternatives. Besides, I am sure that only the first 5 positions really matter regarding traffic. Am I correct?

Now of the best of these free hosting options, I also believe that none can outweigh a well-optimized site on your own domain. You mentioned using Web 2.0 for a short promotion, but when are you able to use a blogger or something for a permanent ranking?

How exactly do you use the search based keyword tool to uncover new keywords, how many do you gain, and how do initially go about identifying markets and root keywords for products across the various networks you mentioned?

Is 1500 Global Monthly Search Volume on exact match an appropriate minimum of monthly traffic for either a domain or Web 2.0 property? Some have said that Google is inaccurate for lower monthly search volume on exact match. What do you say?

Thanks

Genghis John said:

Yukinari, when I first learned of SEnuke, I assumed that taking multiple listings on page one required the use of all of the web 2.0 properties. I am now somewhat more convinced that this is rarely attainable, but fortunately unnecessary.

Multiple rankings with "stronger" sites seems to be more feasible. I have seen sites like ezine and squidoo repeatedly ranking over the alternatives. Besides, I am sure that only the first 5 positions really matter regarding traffic. Am I correct?

Now of the best of these free hosting options, I also believe that none can outweigh a well-optimized site on your own domain. You mentioned using Web 2.0 for a short promotion, but when are you able to use a blogger or something for a permanent ranking?

How exactly do you use the search based keyword tool to uncover new keywords, how many do you gain, and how do initially go about identifying markets and root keywords for products across the various networks you mentioned?

Is 1500 Global Monthly Search Volume on exact match an appropriate minimum of monthly traffic for either a domain or Web 2.0 property? Some have said that Google is inaccurate for lower monthly search volume on exact match. What do you say?

Thanks

Click to expand...

To answer your questions:

1. Obtaining multiple rankings for KWs is not impossible and there a re many marketers that do this day in and day out. How fast you can rank, what spot, how much work it will take, etc all depend on your KW competition.

2. The top 3 spots is where most of the traffic goes, but the more spots you rank for the more traffic you can get.

3. I never use free sites for permanent rankings. Of course you want to rank your own sites and its pages within the SERPs for their targeted KWs. That's the whole point to using supporting sites like Web 2.0.

4. It sounds like you need to read up more on the basics like market research, KW research, etc. It's very important and vital to the success of any campaign.

5. 1500 month global monthly searches could be ok or it could not. What matters the most to me is how targeted the KW is towards buyers and how heavy the competition is.

I appreciate your answers.

I understand the relationship between competition and rankings, but are not article sites like ezine and web 2.0 portals like squidoo more authoritative, leading to better rankings from the start despite both on page and off page SEO? I just don't want to use a random property that has little weight. Of course they are good for backlinks and confer a degree of authority.

#3 was not to exclude domain usage, but to consider the possibility of a permanent ranking with a web 2.0 property. It sounds as though that is not a solid plan from the way you say it.

I like that you can use 1500 assuming an adequate quality of the traffic. I see many keywords like that, but until now it seemed insignificant. But on phrase match, the terms are usually higher and there are more keywords to pick up. I believe I saw that you like to go with phrase match.

Would you even go for [500]? I ask because some say that Google is inaccurate for the lower trafficked search terms like this. If that is true, then obviously there is a green light.

I am a little disappointed that you think I need to do a little more reading. I guess I made it sound that way, but in reality I have read dozens of materials regarding market research and keyword research.

Actually I think I am plagued with too much research. It just can't be that hard.

I identify valid markets by high gravity, epc, network earnings (the principle remains the same, that people are buying). I also might look at significant content being written at ezine articles and repeated authors writing them. Then there are the trend sites provided with SEnuke.

That is enough to get some seed keywords, and I just enter a few into the adwords tool and systematically reenter ones for more that seem to fit the criterion. Additionally I use the wonder wheel and related searches features of google search for more ideas. I might also add more keywords while maintaining the mindset of the searcher, including grammatical variations, terms of the trade, lingo, etc. I use exact match, as you may have guessed.

I admit I don't really see the use of the search-based keyword tool, but I have never used it in the past. That is what I didn't understand.

With these questions answered, and with no shortage of keywords, I should be able to use either a domain or web 2.0 properly to rank for keywords that have high traffic, relevancy, market demand, and low competition.

Ideally these promotions would be for "pretty much anything" on multiple networks, as you say. That is the goal.

I have no problem putting out lots of unique content, I just hate the feeling that I am missing something. I don't care about laboriousness if I am sure of what I am doing.

If I am to hear conflicting information, I would much rather hear from someone who is actively engaged in these activities every day than some piece of content which can never reply to logical questions.

Thanks for being cool, by the way. I know you don't want to coach. I believe I'm pretty much set, but would you mind correcting any possible flagrant errors and push me in the general direction in which I should go?

Hi Yukinari, I was reading the post but I am not clear on one thing.

If I am promoting my money site, I create the accounts for social bookmarking, article directories, etc, should I keep using the same accounts to build backlinks? Should I create a different account for every blast I do?

I am afraid that doing several blasts from the same accounts will harm my site. Is there a limit on how much an account could be reused for blasting? Thanks for this great post!

when you revive 9 month old threads..there's the possibility that people in the thread aren't hanging around here. Yukinari hasn't been on since
05-10-2011

lol I was so interested reading the thread that I did not notice it was so old

lol kenayu me too.. necroposters