SENuke Question

Is SENuke worth buying still?

I used a cracked version a few years ago and loved it despite not being able to make full use of it.

Was thinking of purchasing it in the next few weeks but was just wondering what your opinions of it were.

Was on the official SENuke forum and it is still getting great reviews by the board members.

What are your opinions?

Thanks

Just try it there is 7 day free trial.

its good if you know SEO, it will fail if you do not have basic knowledge of SEO.

cashbro said:

Just try it there is 7 day free trial.

Click to expand...

To see results will take longer than 7 days though.

I will be doing the free trial this week anyway.

Lotta bitching going on in the forum. The answer is always "Wait until SENuke X."

For web2.0 account and creation and content submission it is the best tool out there. Very high success rate and a decent number of sites.

SO for making link rings - it is very good (also consider Serpassist, it has far fewer site but 100% success rate)

However, everything else about nuke is now very old and inferior.
It has a piss poor keyword tool, very few article sites, clunky bookmarking, limnited number of RSS aggregators to feed to and a spinner on a par with one you'd find free on the web and a video submission tool not much better than a free Tubemogul account.

However, if you don't have good tools to do these for you (and there are several in each category that far outperform Nuke in terms of speed, sites submitted to, accuracy etc etc) Then consider Nuke as it will "just about" do these other things.

My opinion (sorry)

Keyword - MNF or Samurai
RSS AGG -Ksofts RSS submitter
Spinner - Best article spinner
Social BM -BM demon if you do a lot, BMwiz if you dabble
Video -Tubemogul free for most, paid for those that are really into it
Article - Article Marketing Robot (it's so far ahead of the competition you can't even see it's back wheels for dust)

These tool are far superior in their specialist fields to Nuke.

But Nuke is pretty much King of WEB2.0 linkwheel creation, and that counts for a lot.

Scritty

Thanks Scritty for your insight...Do you do any profile nuking? I started doing that with SEnuke, and TBH, I can't see a huge measurable success.

Does anyone know if there is an Article Marketing Robot discount on BHW?

To be honest lately I am becoming more and more pissed of it becouse of the many non-working sites(Like 10-15% aren't working) and when the guy asked me to buy the 300$ version just becouse I used it from 2 computers I just said thats it and downloaded the cracked version. Don't PM me I won't give you the cracked version and no I won't tell you where you can get it.

Georgebg said:

To be honest lately I am becoming more and more pissed....

Click to expand...

To be clear, are you talking about AMR or SEnuke?

CypSteel said:

Thanks Scritty for your insight...Do you do any profile nuking? I started doing that with SEnuke, and TBH, I can't see a huge measurable success.

Does anyone know if there is an Article Marketing Robot discount on BHW?

Click to expand...

No - I used to do a little profile stuff. IMO "empty" profiles are about the biggest footprint of "manufactured" offsite SEO that you could possibly leave.

after RSS and directory submission I use good quality links (from private networks) then content distribution (web2.0 and articles). Bookmarking is still the best way to get links found and powered up that I've found (black hat bookmarking that is - multiple BM's with multiple accounts)

Profile links (esspecially empty ones) just seem like an unnecassary risk to me

Scritty

CypSteel said:

To be clear, are you talking about AMR or SEnuke?

Click to expand...

No-one had mentioned AMR before you - so I doubt it was that.
Also it doesn't cost $300 (or $150 for one)

15% failure on a product that submits to over 1500 is not that bad anyway (as long as it hits 95% of the high PR sites)

Scritty

jackanapes said:

Lotta bitching going on in the forum. The answer is always "Wait until SENuke X."

Click to expand...

hahaha.... I love going to that forum and making that idiot kelix mad... serves him right for not fixing the crap senuke has turned into nowadays, full of sites that don't work.

Scritty said:

No - I used to do a little profile stuff. IMO "empty" profiles are about the biggest footprint of "manufactured" offsite SEO that you could possibly leave.

after RSS and directory submission I use good quality links (from private networks) then content distribution (web2.0 and articles). Bookmarking is still the best way to get links found and powered up that I've found (black hat bookmarking that is - multiple BM's with multiple accounts)

Profile links (esspecially empty ones) just seem like an unnecassary risk to me

Scritty

Click to expand...

What do you use for directory submission...and how do you use RSS? SENuke promotes using RSS as the indexing tool...are you indicating it should be used for backlinks too?

For what it's worth, I have been having a lot of success with xGenSEO over SENUKE when it comes to Web2.0 creation and submission.

I also use SE nuke cracked version but not satisfied with its results.So think for scrapbox or xumer most demanding softwares now a days

Think i might be giving it a miss then but i'll try the free trial anyway this week.

CypSteel said:

What do you use for directory submission...and how do you use RSS? SENuke promotes using RSS as the indexing tool...are you indicating it should be used for backlinks too?

Click to expand...

Most web2.0 sites offer a unique RSS feed, those that don't I use "host my RSS" It is 3rd party hosting, but RSS is mostly about coverage early on in a site/profile/article life rather than long term link juice.

Ksofts RSS tool submits to 130 out of the box (I see products for sale that send to 30 and seem quite proud about it!) and a further 40 or 50 that have a semi auto sign up (they want a reciprocal link)

Directory Submits I use Josh Spauldings Deep Linker Pro (though I'm hoping V2.0 comes out soon, it only has 4 or 5 directories that accept deep links at the moment) But overall it submits to 400+ directories (50% of which ask for reciprocal link, there is a folder with a "NOFOLLOW" list you can upload to your host for this, it takes 2 minutes.

Again, this isn't so much about backlinks but an early "shout out" to get noticed.There is some link juice in this, but not a massive amount.

I wouldn't bother trying to ping or juice the links you get this way. I like these to be found over time. They help, but they aren't massive juice wise.

I would not build a site without doing this first though.

I use a about 4 other "pure" linking strategies. Link packages (one off fee), a private link network (allows a lot of keyword anchored links on decent sites - very good), WEB2.0 link structures (Never made one that looks much like a "ring" but you know what I mean I used to use Nuke for this, but stopped when I found other software that did it more reliably (after much experimentation and cash wasted I might add) article marketing and finally bookmarking.

Bookmarking is good for link juicing as well as links in their own right. A good tool and 30-50 accounts and a bunch of private proxies)

I will also use tools like scrapebox as well (on the web2.0 sites and articles - never EVER on my own site)

That way I can get literally thousands upon thousands of links created in a day, and bookmark them over time to get them found.

I just leaves me to do the writing and the spinning


I have tools for just about all of it - and I no longer use Nuke.

60% success the guy above was saying. If that's true, then the last and only reason I would buy this overbloated/overpriced software has finally gone.

90% minimum or you spend more time fiddling to get stuiff working than it's worth - and you might as well do the stuff manually.

Interested to find out if others are experiencing such a low success rate with WEB2.0 stuff with Nuke, and if they still think it's worth 130 dollars a month for such a poor return if they are?

Scritty

Yes, but how it is done?