What do you use for directory submission...and how do you use RSS? SENuke promotes using RSS as the indexing tool...are you indicating it should be used for backlinks too?
Most web2.0 sites offer a unique RSS feed, those that don't I use "host my RSS" It is 3rd party hosting, but RSS is mostly about coverage early on in a site/profile/article life rather than long term link juice.
Ksofts RSS tool submits to 130 out of the box (I see products for sale that send to 30 and seem quite proud about it!) and a further 40 or 50 that have a semi auto sign up (they want a reciprocal link)
Directory Submits I use Josh Spauldings Deep Linker Pro (though I'm hoping V2.0 comes out soon, it only has 4 or 5 directories that accept deep links at the moment) But overall it submits to 400+ directories (50% of which ask for reciprocal link, there is a folder with a "NOFOLLOW" list you can upload to your host for this, it takes 2 minutes.
Again, this isn't so much about backlinks but an early "shout out" to get noticed.There is some link juice in this, but not a massive amount.
I wouldn't bother trying to ping or juice the links you get this way. I like these to be found over time. They help, but they aren't massive juice wise.
I would not build a site without doing this first though.
I use a about 4 other "pure" linking strategies. Link packages (one off fee), a private link network (allows a lot of keyword anchored links on decent sites - very good), WEB2.0 link structures (Never made one that looks much like a "ring" but you know what I mean I used to use Nuke for this, but stopped when I found other software that did it more reliably (after much experimentation and cash wasted I might add) article marketing and finally bookmarking.
Bookmarking is good for link juicing as well as links in their own right. A good tool and 30-50 accounts and a bunch of private proxies)
I will also use tools like scrapebox as well (on the web2.0 sites and articles - never EVER on my own site)
That way I can get literally thousands upon thousands of links created in a day, and bookmark them over time to get them found.
I just leaves me to do the writing and the spinning
I have tools for just about all of it - and I no longer use Nuke.
60% success the guy above was saying. If that's true, then the last and only reason I would buy this overbloated/overpriced software has finally gone.
90% minimum or you spend more time fiddling to get stuiff working than it's worth - and you might as well do the stuff manually.
Interested to find out if others are experiencing such a low success rate with WEB2.0 stuff with Nuke, and if they still think it's worth 130 dollars a month for such a poor return if they are?
Scritty
