blissbliss
Regular Member
- May 6, 2017
- 420
- 96
First I will tell you that I'm not a SEMrush fan.In fact, I don't like them much because they don't have a database in my language.So SEMrush is a useless tool for me and I prefer Ahrefs.But their study is interesting so I have to share with you guys 
I used to start a thread about SEMrush ranking factor https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/semrush-ranking-factor-2017-research-discuss.962330/ . Now the 2.0 version is published.Check it out https://drive.google.com/file/d/18dZ1lFBeQDAbxyLtEEtGY53vwNJ7f0HV/view?usp=sharing
Key interesting point
-Direct traffic is the winner same as 1.0 research.
-SEMrush add more 5 factors
-If you remembered the old one.You will see that many factors will drop in rank 1 .Guess what SEMrush has answered in this research .Check out by your self on page 50.
-SEMrush mention about their methodology Random forest and why they don't use correlation.
Read the study and come discussion here .
I used to start a thread about SEMrush ranking factor https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/semrush-ranking-factor-2017-research-discuss.962330/ . Now the 2.0 version is published.Check it out https://drive.google.com/file/d/18dZ1lFBeQDAbxyLtEEtGY53vwNJ7f0HV/view?usp=sharing
Key interesting point
-Direct traffic is the winner same as 1.0 research.
-SEMrush add more 5 factors
-If you remembered the old one.You will see that many factors will drop in rank 1 .Guess what SEMrush has answered in this research .Check out by your self on page 50.
-SEMrush mention about their methodology Random forest and why they don't use correlation.
Read the study and come discussion here .