artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
Does using antidetect browser have the same effect as connecting to a remote computer p2p?
Remote desktop vs proxy+antidetect browser
- Thread starter artificials
- Start date
Kamikaizer
BANNED
- Apr 29, 2024
- 55
- 18
I think this is a basis for Antidetect browser
artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
I had planned to p2p but if this does the same, it's much easier.
artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
I don't quite follow you. Do they serve the same purpuse, so I can confidently use proxy and antidetect instead of remote desktop to another computer?No, residential proxies are p2p network.
antidetect browser is somewhat host your account on cloud
take care some platform
Because proxy alone won't do that, there are still other factors like time zone etc etc.
This is also interesting. So, now I am thinking, is it safe to login to Google account in antidetect?antidetect browser is somewhat host your account on cloud
Last edited:
- Oct 28, 2020
- 579
- 121
The remote desktop will be a safer option because it will be a totally different environment, and it is very hard to track if you use RDP + Antidetect browser + Residetial IPs. If you have good budget and you are doing some serious stuffs, I will suggest you this.
artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
Remote desktop is way harder and limited somehow. If antidetect+proxy dies the same I would go for it.
I meant connecting to a nother person computer through remote desktop but you seem to suggest something different.
Are you talking about installing antidetect on a vps?
- Oct 28, 2020
- 579
- 121
Yes.
artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
My use case is motsly by passing restricted geo location for fintech and ads accounts.
- Jan 11, 2023
- 1,475
- 498
A profile created in an anti-detect browser acts like a new device, meaning websites will recognize your accounts as coming from different devices and locations (if you're using a proxy to change the IP address).
- Mar 26, 2021
- 1,153
- 95
No, using an antidetect browser and connecting to a remote computer via P2P are different. An antidetect browser masks your browser fingerprint to avoid detection, while P2P remote access connects you directly to another computer, allowing you to use its environment and resources. Both methods serve distinct purposes and are not interchangeable.
artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
That's my question indeed. How are the not interchangable?
What am I missing here!
- Mar 26, 2021
- 1,153
- 95
Because Antidetect browsers mask browser fingerprints for anonymity, while P2P remote access gives you control over another computer’s environment. They serve different purposes and are not substitutes for each other.
artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
Right that's what's happening. But in practice, would a website recognise their difference?
Can I confidently use antidetect for the same purpose? Without bothering other people abroad?
- Mar 26, 2021
- 1,153
- 95
Websites usually detect your browser settings and IP address not the exact method you're using to access them. Antidetect browsers can imitate what you'd achieve with P2P remote access by changing your fingerprints and location data, but they can’t fully recreate the environment of a real remote computer. In most cases, antidetect browsers work well for similar purposes, though advanced detection methods might still pick up on subtle differences.
artificials
Power Member
- Aug 17, 2024
- 662
- 211
Ok, thank you. It's usable that way.