Remote desktop vs proxy+antidetect browser

[artificials]

Does using antidetect browser have the same effect as connecting to a remote computer p2p?

 

[Kamikaizer]

I think this is a basis for Antidetect browser

remote computer p2p?

 

[artificials]

I think this is a basis for Antidetect browser

I had planned to p2p but if this does the same, it's much easier.

 

[turelink]

No, residential proxies are p2p network.

antidetect browser is somewhat host your account on cloud

take care some platform

 

[artificials]

No, residential proxies are p2p network.

antidetect browser is somewhat host your account on cloud

take care some platform

I don't quite follow you. Do they serve the same purpuse, so I can confidently use proxy and antidetect instead of remote desktop to another computer?
Because proxy alone won't do that, there are still other factors like time zone etc etc.

antidetect browser is somewhat host your account on cloud

This is also interesting. So, now I am thinking, is it safe to login to Google account in antidetect?

 

[samratfkt]

The remote desktop will be a safer option because it will be a totally different environment, and it is very hard to track if you use RDP + Antidetect browser + Residetial IPs. If you have good budget and you are doing some serious stuffs, I will suggest you this.

 

[artificials]

The remote desktop will be a safer option because it will be a totally different environment, and it is very hard to track if you use RDP + Antidetect browser + Residetial IPs. If you have good budget and you are doing some serious stuffs, I will suggest you this.

Remote desktop is way harder and limited somehow. If antidetect+proxy dies the same I would go for it.
I meant connecting to a nother person computer through remote desktop but you seem to suggest something different.
Are you talking about installing antidetect on a vps?

 

[samratfkt]

Remote desktop is way harder and limited somehow. If antidetect+proxy dies the same I would go for it.
I meant connecting to a nother person computer through remote desktop but you seem to suggest something different.
Are you talking about installing antidetect on a vps?

Yes.

 

[artificials]

Yes.

My use case is motsly by passing restricted geo location for fintech and ads accounts.

 

[Hidemyacc Global]

A profile created in an anti-detect browser acts like a new device, meaning websites will recognize your accounts as coming from different devices and locations (if you're using a proxy to change the IP address).

 

[Deep9889]

No, using an antidetect browser and connecting to a remote computer via P2P are different. An antidetect browser masks your browser fingerprint to avoid detection, while P2P remote access connects you directly to another computer, allowing you to use its environment and resources. Both methods serve distinct purposes and are not interchangeable.

 

[artificials]

No, using an antidetect browser and connecting to a remote computer via P2P are different. An antidetect browser masks your browser fingerprint to avoid detection, while P2P remote access connects you directly to another computer, allowing you to use its environment and resources. Both methods serve distinct purposes and are not interchangeable.

That's my question indeed. How are the not interchangable?
What am I missing here!

 

[Deep9889]

That's my question indeed. How are the not interchangable?
What am I missing here!

Because Antidetect browsers mask browser fingerprints for anonymity, while P2P remote access gives you control over another computer’s environment. They serve different purposes and are not substitutes for each other.

 

[artificials]

Because Antidetect browsers mask browser fingerprints for anonymity, while P2P remote access gives you control over another computer’s environment. They serve different purposes and are not substitutes for each other.

Right that's what's happening. But in practice, would a website recognise their difference?
Can I confidently use antidetect for the same purpose? Without bothering other people abroad?

 

[Deep9889]

Right that's what's happening. But in practice, would a website recognise their difference?
Can I confidently use antidetect for the same purpose? Without bothering other people abroad?

Websites usually detect your browser settings and IP address not the exact method you're using to access them. Antidetect browsers can imitate what you'd achieve with P2P remote access by changing your fingerprints and location data, but they can’t fully recreate the environment of a real remote computer. In most cases, antidetect browsers work well for similar purposes, though advanced detection methods might still pick up on subtle differences.

 

[artificials]

Websites usually detect your browser settings and IP address not the exact method you're using to access them. Antidetect browsers can imitate what you'd achieve with P2P remote access by changing your fingerprints and location data, but they can’t fully recreate the environment of a real remote computer. In most cases, antidetect browsers work well for similar purposes, though advanced detection methods might still pick up on subtle differences.

Ok, thank you. It's usable that way.