You wrote something about the source I quoted, so please prove me wrong that Statista is not a reliable source.
Statista just contains a lot of misinformation. It is not reliable by any means. It's just Wikipedia but for statistics.
They don't themselves conduct statistical research. They just copy the statistics from other papers/sources.
Anything that you can find on Statista can and will be found elsewhere.
If you're going to quote statistics, quote the original source. Not the intermediary.
If you think quoting an intermediary is okay (for reliability), then I literally don't have anything else to say to you other than 'good luck'.
If this is your answer, don't waste my time, kid.
19 years old and want to tell me something about academic research.
Yea. Very mature of you, an 'adult', to stuck up on my age.
And for your knowledge,
I went through one of the best IT vocational schools in Finland at the same time as I went to one of the most prestigious universities here. At the same time, at the ages of 16 - 19 (median age for universities is 24 here). Also starting my Bachelor's Degree on cybersecurity in a few months.
I have written several papers surrounding the IT field, and also published a full book on how neurobiological disruptions affect productivity on a scientifical level, on a secondary language at the age of 15/16.
Did all that whilst I also started a 6-figure agency at the ages of 16 to 19.
So, yeah, I happen to know a bit about academical research.
I really don't care to answer to you anymore. Whatever floats your boat - you do you.