1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Re-using web 2.0 blogs for back links

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by Tribal Fusion, Dec 19, 2016.

  1. Tribal Fusion

    Tribal Fusion Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    19
    A couple of months ago I sold a site which was ranked with my web 2.0 network of 20 sites. All of my main keywords were on page one with a keyword difficulty of 29, 31 and 36. I created another site in the same niche back in August and added about 10 links from th web 2.0 network and I then left the site until the 3rd week of October after I had sold the original site. Since the end of October I have removed all the links to my old site and replaced with either new links or moved the anchor text to another part of the articles on the web 2.0s.

    Two months after the sale not all of my web 2.0s are showing on my new site under GWT, I've added more tier 2 links from fiverr behind the web 2.0s, 9 of them have 50+ links going into them. My buyer did not take me off Google analytics, so I can see in GWT loads of my web 2.0s are powering his site and not boosting mine :-( I've re-indexed the web 2.0s, pinged them and now I'm deleting posts that were linked to my old site and creating new ones.

    I'm not sure how to get my network fully powering up my new site seeing as I've bought over 300 pbn links to power up the web 2.0s.
     
  2. moneyflower

    moneyflower Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2016
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    52
    Removing backlinks from a site you sold is cruel !
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  3. nichexposure

    nichexposure Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,419
    Likes Received:
    378
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    I just pretend to know SEO
    Location:
    2nd Page of Google
    Home Page:
    Your blogs are indexed so don't worry about it. Now GW is taking too long time to count the web 2.0 blogs (from my experience). Wait a few more days and it will show in GW i believe. Agreed with @moneyflower you can keep the links and update anchor with new post. That will help to boost your web 2.0 more. Anyways your choice :)
     
  4. Topiano

    Topiano Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Messages:
    679
    Likes Received:
    141
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    SEO

    That's the trust ... Why would you want to remove you web2.0 in the first place .

    It's really cruel ...
     
  5. satruk

    satruk Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    42
    why u not create new post and link to your new site without delete old post?

    It's really cruel
     
  6. Tribal Fusion

    Tribal Fusion Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    19
    Well, I sold the site, not the web 2.0 blogs and I'm hitting the same niche, so I don't want to keep ranking a competitor.

    I've removed all the links to my old site and replaced them with links to my new site, anyway the old site seems to be doing better after I sold it.
     
  7. patriotnews

    patriotnews Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2015
    Messages:
    853
    Likes Received:
    462
    Location:
    under there
    Wow, just a bad business practice here, unless you sold the site based entirely upon content, not counting rank/traffic/anything SEO related, because otherwise you are actively attempting to remove the backlink profile to the site you sold, which was more than likely factored into the sale price/consideration... Why not just report their PBN, or report the backlinks you made to get rid of them while you're at it, maybe send a GSA blast at their money site? I mean they're a competitor now... I mean, hey you got their money already.

    Just build new posts or even new web 2.0 properties and build it up again, without ripping them down.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  8. asap1

    asap1 BANNED BANNED Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,961
    Likes Received:
    3,179
    Google has to re-crawl the pages.

    Get google to the page.
     
  9. Sardosa

    Sardosa Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    59
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Occupational management
    Location:
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Home Page:
    this is really bad. where are you heading with this?
     
  10. mangoodi

    mangoodi Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    129
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Blogger
    Location:
    In front of my laptop
    Home Page:
    @Mike Trahan : Have you read the thread post. Reported
     
  11. b6ainy

    b6ainy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2015
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    70
    Gender:
    Male

    YOU SHOULD BE A SHAME OF YOURSELF

    If any one have this guy service link so we all can be aware of buying any of his services or sites.

    I call this a spam services. You guys who fill Fippa of full of shit spam sites.
     
  12. Maxxpowa

    Maxxpowa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2016
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    24
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah sorry OP but you don't deserve help. That's a shit thing to do. Basically scammed your buyer.
     
  13. Tribal Fusion

    Tribal Fusion Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    19
    Hardly scamming, the site is higher than when I sold it, so the new owner is using a hosted pbn to rank it better.
     
  14. Maxxpowa

    Maxxpowa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2016
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    24
    Gender:
    Male
    Did you tell the owner you were going to remove the links before they purchased it?
     
  15. Tribal Fusion

    Tribal Fusion Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    19
    The new owner didn't ask about how it was ranked, but said they could do a better job. I pointed out it had a web 2.0 network, but that was not for sale and they were happy to buy. The new owner didn't ask for the links to be kept and I presume it's powered by a pbn network now as the average site position has increased since it was bought and continued increasing after I had removed my links.

    I wouldn't expect someone to rank my site if I bought a website, you buy the keywords and the keyword competitiveness, most of the content has been changed too and with a Thrive theme.
     
  16. Maxxpowa

    Maxxpowa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2016
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    24
    Gender:
    Male
    Well each to their own - but I certainly disagree with what you have done.

    At least I know to ask questions to cover this in the future!
     
  17. upstarter

    upstarter Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    46
    I agree with OP. If the buyer bought OP's site because the buyer thinks he can do better ranking it, then OP can remove the web 2.0 links. Buyer did not asked how it was ranked so I think removing the links was not a big deal to the buyer.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  18. NightSEO

    NightSEO BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2016
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    8
    Added you to my shitlist and everyone here should too.
     
  19. Beergut

    Beergut Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wouldn't mess with it as far building links. Just build new links with your exisiing web 2.0s or create new web 2.0s. If their not getting indexed there's no use in trying to beat a bad horse anyways.
     
  20. nSnoopy

    nSnoopy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    22
    Karma is a b!tch
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1