Ranking with manually paraphrased articles - small case study results

blackbeans said:

First, thanks for sharing your journey into paraphrasing or rewriting content.

Content rewrites do work.

But as you said, it boils down to keeping the target keywords.

It also boils down to having the right structure.

A lot of people are under the impression that if they're going to rewrite somebody else's informative content, they basically have to change everything.

Get all the information but put it in completely different words and structure, and nearly throw out the baby with the bath water.

Thank you for highlighting the fact that the foundations of the source content have to be there, and just as importantly, the focus should be on the end user.

As you said, paraphrase the text as if you are explaining information to a friend.

And this is crucial because until people don't step into the shoes of the person they expect to read their content, they will be rolling the dice.

Some of their content will rank really well.

Others will go nowhere.

But suppose online publishers took more control over the process of addressing search intent to ensure that they produce content that gives the readers the experience they're looking for.

In that case, they are more likely to be rewarded with better rankings.

This is good stuff.

I like the quality guidelines you laid out: short, concise, and to the point.

Also, my personal approach to PAA content is to focus on the main keyword that the article as a whole is targeting.

This sets up an "umbrella" for the wide range of related questions you can put into the article.

Also, you can't ramble about each answer because you're trying to write only a snippet.

You're shooting to directly answer while simultaneously putting in a call to action to get the reader to read the rest of the article.

This takes much trial and error, but it can and is being done.

The key is to terminate that search.

Don't let that reader click the back button.

Anyways, thank you for this awesome share.

Click to expand...

AmberJones said:

will it work with YMYL niche and new domain?

Click to expand...

MisterF said:

Totally agree, most content writers have never tested the product or visited the holiday resort they write about, so this is no different.

Click to expand...

Kinu Actaz said:

hen paste into Quillbot then copy the whole output and paste it again under my answer.

Click to expand...

jeronymo29 said:

What quillbot mode do you use?

Click to expand...

Kinu Actaz said:

Creative

Click to expand...

jeronymo29 said:

I use that mod too. I just wanted to confirm my choice with someone else.
Thank you

Click to expand...

Kinu Actaz said:

I checked all modes and found this one gives the best output.

Click to expand...

Kinu Actaz said:

I checked all modes and found this one gives the best output.

Click to expand...

JohnWinchester said:

Thanks for sharing this. Another questions please ! How about your plagiarism score using quetext or copyscape after paraphrase using quillbot and manual editing?

Click to expand...

Kinu Actaz said:

I prefer less than 5%

Click to expand...

JohnWinchester said:

How do you keep that score so low. Even i do paraphrase 2 times with quillbot i still get way much % plagiarism ,usually 50% unique.

Click to expand...

JohnWinchester said:

How do you keep that score so low. Even i do paraphrase 2 times with quillbot i still get way much % plagiarism ,usually 50% unique.

Click to expand...