Ranking with manually paraphrased articles - small case study results

Interesting case study
I'm a fan of AI-generated content and it can only get better
 
Well done! I've done something like this in the past for a few of my sites. Find a topic of interest related to the site that isn't getting too much attention and then take the top articles and paraphrase them, and improve on them. My biggest success with that process went to the #1 spot on G in under a month and I went from having nearly no traffic to around a few hundred hits per month. The topic (how we get paid) became fairly controversial and lawsuits started flowing over it within the industry, so I took it down to play it safe.

Like you, it's a topic I know about so it was real easy to "brain dump" and end up with ~1,350 words compared to their 300-500 words. Often I'd just use the heading and completely re-do the paragraph. I need to do more of this, especially for my other sites. I have tried spinners in the past (actually bought Spinner Chief) to help with some of the rewriting, especially on topics I didn't know well or that were very generic (like the history of a city). Still ended up taking a long time, but it became a nice unique article. On the newer sites, it's more finding topics of value since the niches aren't exactly flush with content.
 
Well done! I've done something like this in the past for a few of my sites. Find a topic of interest related to the site that isn't getting too much attention and then take the top articles and paraphrase them, and improve on them. My biggest success with that process went to the #1 spot on G in under a month and I went from having nearly no traffic to around a few hundred hits per month. The topic (how we get paid) became fairly controversial and lawsuits started flowing over it within the industry, so I took it down to play it safe.

Like you, it's a topic I know about so it was real easy to "brain dump" and end up with ~1,350 words compared to their 300-500 words. Often I'd just use the heading and completely re-do the paragraph. I need to do more of this, especially for my other sites. I have tried spinners in the past (actually bought Spinner Chief) to help with some of the rewriting, especially on topics I didn't know well or that were very generic (like the history of a city). Still ended up taking a long time, but it became a nice unique article. On the newer sites, it's more finding topics of value since the niches aren't exactly flush with content.
how do you paraphrase them? Any software?
 
Pretty awesome share, thanks for the case study. As your traffic grows, have you considered adding Amazon or other affiliate links? I would think that your highly targeted traffic would be a perfect match for this, even w/o the “best of..” articles.

Much success and tuna salad to you!
 
Interesting case study
I'm a fan of AI-generated content and it can only get better
I’ve been curious about using AI content for a while, have you had any results with traffic that you wouldn’t mind sharing? Just generally I mean, not talking spoon feeding lol
 
Pretty awesome share, thanks for the case study. As your traffic grows, have you considered adding Amazon or other affiliate links? I would think that your highly targeted traffic would be a perfect match for this, even w/o the “best of..” articles.

Much success and tuna salad to you!
There's no amazon in my country, as people never order from amazon.
We do have some kind of profit share, but the payouts are even more garbage than Adsense, for example, you get $7 if someone orders a $800 laptop.

The other translated ones I have been doing great with ezoic @ around 7 Euro ePMV
 
Just for my own clarity, paraphrasing means rewriting right?
 
That is the power of knowing English and being able to re-write a piece of content. Anyone reading this, if you have nothing but time, churn out re-written content that is 100% unique in Google's eyes and try your luck. I've personally done this and it works. Only difference is I use a paraphraser and then manually edit the article heavily to make it quick.
Just for my own clarity, paraphrasing means rewriting right?
Yes.
 
Very interesting! I believe I now have a wonderful idea for my park domain, which has sat dormant since I purchased it a few months ago. The time has come for it to go live, hehe.
 
Yes, I've seen people reporting they got deindexed completely innocent.
But since I am not innocent, I have to assume they know what's going on, or at least have some doubts about it.

Or they just randomly do this kind of shit, who knows.
Thanks for the whole thread buddy, takes a lot of stress out of the search for content.

Can I ask how you believe Bing have spotted you? Like who's to say the 30 articles from the beginning weren't just very well questioned topics?

If you found another 4-5 websites in the same niche and spotted say 30 from each and mixed and matched would that not just make it competitive analysis?
 
3. Ever since I got into seo/IM I always went for a tech niche because more or less, I at least have SOME ideas about the topic. Not an expert, but at least I know why an m2 SSD with dram is better than one without, as a quick example.

Why I chose that particular blog was because he had multiple snippets featuring on google for a lot of keywords, with a 9 month blog. The guy knows his keyword research. I just piggybacked on his work. I can make an educated guess that, if I would choose articles and keywords for which pcmag is ranking #1, the results wouldn't have been that great.

Thank yoooou.
 
Until now, whatever tool (for example quillbot) I used for paraphrasing was plagiarism.
I wish someone could refute this. Check the received article in all three tools: 1text, quetext and grammarly (all are free).
@Alexion I would appreciate your opinion. Thank you.
 
how do you paraphrase them? Any software?
My biggest success and most of the ones I've done have all been by hand. It helps that I know the field extremely well. More recently I started using Spinner Chief based on recommendations on BHW. It does a good job, but like all tools, it needs some tweaking afterward. I find I do a fair amount of manual editing still. No tool will be 100% perfect. This niche is a new one for me, and one I'm not very well versed in, so these tools help me quite a bit.

In all fairness to the tool, I got it over the Black Friday sales last year and have only scratched the surface of the settings and what it can do. I'm also using it for content for a Tier 1 "money" site, where these tools are usually best for your tier 2 or 3 sites (I'm not using a multi-tier structure). The content is also very dry that I'm spinning/paraphrasing. Mostly history of the area and stuff like that for a travel site.
 
Until now, whatever tool (for example quillbot) I used for paraphrasing was plagiarism.
I wish someone could refute this. Check the received article in all three tools: 1text, quetext and grammarly (all are free).
@Alexion I would appreciate your opinion. Thank you.
I have not used any tool, this is not about using tools.
I'm talking about using your hands and rewriting the original in your own words, without facing the issue of lack of ideas, since you have the original in your face.

Here's a quick example I picked from google just now:

How much caffeine you usually get may also play a role. People with https://www.webmd.com/diabetes/default.htm who are regular coffee drinkers don’t have higher blood sugar levels than those who aren’t. Some experts think your body gets used to that amount of caffeine over time. But other research shows that caffeine could still cause a spike, even if you always start your day with a cup of joe.
Here would be my take:

Another important factor would be the amount of caffeine you usually ingest. Blood sugar doesn't increase in regular coffee drinkers who suffer from diabetes more than in people who aren't diabetics. Over time, you develop a tolerance to caffeine and your body becomes accustomed. This is true even if you can't start your morning without that cup of coffee.
1text says it's 67% unique. It's fine.

I could perhaps make it even simpler. Cut some long sentences and make 2-3 more out of them. But it's a rough example.
There are 4-5 free courses on Udemy(yes, FREE) which teach you how to do better as a journalist.

They emphasize the idea that most of them use A LOT of passive voice. If change a sentence from passive to active, you changed 99% anyway.
Then there are other aspects, my point was it's easy to learn.

This wasn't about half-assing your work using quillcrap or any other tool, but about manual rewording of an article.
 
Thanks for the detailed and helpful answer. Just to clarify, I understood in your previous posts that you propagate manual rewording of an article.
That's why I mentioned that if any tool is used, it is difficult to get a unique article.
I was wondering if you have ever tested any tool and what results it gave. (and it looks like you're not :))
As I wrote before, I appreciate your opinion about rewriting articles and I think you give the best advice about it.
 
@Alexion great and very inspirational share!

May I ask how you used Twitter and Reddit to build backlinks?
Simply submitting links to either subs or hashtags, nothing complicated about it. Solely done for indexing purposes. I do have one do follow link from my own sub reddit, so I don't know how much that counts.
 
I also have some theories, but it's hard to prove so I just assume its content related. Although I bet it's either something to do with wp themes or website ownership.
If you don't mind sharing what you think was, it would be great.
Looks almost just like technical issue on their end.

How is it doing now?
 
Back
Top