i totally agree with that. in the current scenario, relevance and the total quality of the website are way more important than just the number of backlinks. a few backlinks from good nd rellevant websites are more useful than several hundred links. however, quantity is not something to be overlooked altogether after getting quality.Quality over quantity is still the ultimate rule for link building. A single contextual link from a niche-relevant site passes significantly more authority and trust than dozens of low-quality, generic Web 2.0 links.
i believe it is not the quantity of links but the fact that they actually should be there. a few relevant links from legitimate websites will prove to be more valuable than many irrelevant links. it would be better to concenttrate efforts on getting the right links rather than reaching a certain amount of links.Quality over quantity is still the ultimate rule for link building. A single contextual link from a niche-relevant site passes significantly more authority and trust than dozens of low-quality, generic Web 2.0 links.
A single, well placed link from an authority site within your exact vertical serves as a genuine vote of confidence. Distributing low tier links merely inflates a largely meaningless third party metric and diverts time away from securing genuinely high impact placements. Quality invariably prevails.Quality over quantity is still the ultimate rule for link building. A single contextual link from a niche-relevant site passes significantly more authority and trust than dozens of low-quality, generic Web 2.0 links.