[Q] Web 2.0's linking to multiple sites

T

TrevorB

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
1,185
Reaction score
365
I was trying to find some information on this, but
was not able to find an answer to my question, so
here it is.

If you have multiple sites around the same niche,
is it a good idea to link to them, from the same web
2.0 site, from within different articles?

I find it unnecessary to make multiple web 2.0's, let's
say on weebly, for the same niche just to link to the
different websites I have.

Is anyone doing this?
 
Advertise on BHW
I think its good to link to multiple different sites if they are not yours
 
So if I have multiple sites under the same niche, then it's
best to not link to them both from the same web 2.0 site?

Do you have a reason why?
 
Good question and I would like to hear what others say about this aswell
 
I don't think linking from the same web 2.0 to multiple money sites is a good idea - it leaves a pretty huge footprint if it's done over and over. If I was Google, I'd be able to tell that all these web 2.0 sites (supposedly from diff "people") are all always linking to sites owned and operated by a single person using a single webhost/ip/etc

Mix up the links with some non-competing authority sites in your niche to make it look more natural, but stick to one money site per web 2.0
 
if your money sites are on diff ips
diff ns
no interlinking in the money sites
diff whois info

then go for it!
use a network of 50 web2 and maintain them..
 
What I sometimes do for diversity is add one link to my site, and another one to a very high authority site - wikipedia, ask, yahoo answers (as long as they aren't ranking for my keyword).

Keep in mind you never want to use the same links over and over again, as those would be high authority sites, they might actually start ranking for your keyword (given the page is related somehow).
 
BassTrackerBoats said:
What I sometimes do for diversity is add one link to my site, and another one to a very high authority site - wikipedia, ask, yahoo answers (as long as they aren't ranking for my keyword).

Keep in mind you never want to use the same links over and over again, as those would be high authority sites, they might actually start ranking for your keyword (given the page is related somehow).
Click to expand...

Hi,

Can we use the same aged indexed niche web 2.0 for different sites(different keywords interlining to different sites from different articles)
Does it helps for any of my websites to get best backlinks?

Can you help friend...
 
Having web 2.0's with content focused on a specific niche is a good thing...also making posts without links in them is good..
 
Now that Google is trying to get everyone in their G+,
how does anyone know that if we put ourselves out
there as authors for hundreds of different articles, on
many different sites, that it would not help all our
sites that we link to from those web 2.0's?

I know how people are thinking currently, but we all
know that things are changing in the way Google ranks
sites, right?

Should I be the first one to try this, or have I mentioned
something that should have been kept a SECRET?
 
Yeah I say go for it. Like on Wordpress.com Web2 properties I'll use the Gravatar widget and it will have links to all of my money sites under that Author. I have sites ranking 1 and 2 that are built by the same author under Google Authorshiop. Which leads me to believe this "footprint" thing may be a bit overstated.

I say go for it, make more use of each Web2 since you're putting the work into it already
 
i got the same question all over my head. I wanted to build 10 web2.0, and build up authority on them. But i guess its not a good idea to link differents domain with the same ip all over the same property, at the end i think google gonna spot it. lets see what the "gurus" have to say about this
 
politico said:
I don't think linking from the same web 2.0 to multiple money sites is a good idea - it leaves a pretty huge footprint if it's done over and over. If I was Google, I'd be able to tell that all these web 2.0 sites (supposedly from diff "people") are all always linking to sites owned and operated by a single person using a single webhost/ip/etc

Mix up the links with some non-competing authority sites in your niche to make it look more natural, but stick to one money site per web 2.0
Click to expand...

I think politico has a nice point. I am little confused in this point "some non-competing authority sites in your niche". Did you mean wikipedia links?
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top