1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

PR 6 website got unnatural link building penalty

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by ILoveCSharp, Feb 16, 2012.

  1. ILoveCSharp

    ILoveCSharp Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    45
  2. Knoxgates

    Knoxgates Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    918
    I read that thread and i visited the first link and here is what i got

    Anchor texts are Free Vector Art,Free Vector Images,Free Vector all pointing to the same domain which is pretty unnatural.

    He got 3 links from footer of the same website with different anchor texts which is considered pretty unnatural.
    BigG might have done a manual review for his backlinks.He tried to game the system but got detected.
     
  3. blackhaze

    blackhaze Power Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    661
    Likes Received:
    167
    Occupation:
    self made millionaire
    Location:
    in the matrix
    Home Page:
    What is the question exactly? :)

    In Google's eyes, any link is "not organic" which has not been placed by another webmaster "voluntarily" linking to your site.

    it SEEMS that Google just recently started to get REALLY strict and starts to penalize sites also for forum links signature (!!!) and similar, saying those are "inorganic" links. There was a thread on another forum about this.

    In other words: Sh!t is going down, Google is getting REALLY strict!

    We know already they do not like article directories, now signatures/forum links etc... ALL could potentially be bad for your site!
     
  4. DarkDemon

    DarkDemon Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    128
    Location:
    www.seolix.com NY
    Agree.. it's actually BH stuff that are getting the penalties. Like crappy spun article blasts. I guess things are going in the reverse - welcome to whitehat again?
     
  5. Gipsy Kings

    Gipsy Kings Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    28
    Location:
    Offshore Islands
    Sorry , were you drunk when you wrote this sh!t ?!! :D
     
  6. Knoxgates

    Knoxgates Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    918
    Nope. I don't drink. Get few contact lenses dude.
    [​IMG]
    The domain is already penalised.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. Gipsy Kings

    Gipsy Kings Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    28
    Location:
    Offshore Islands
    I've 2 vision glasses already , I can donate one of 'em to you .
    Anyways , the OP means this domain http://goo.gl/1BGvf .


    [​IMG]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  8. assphuck

    assphuck Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,196
    Likes Received:
    905
    So we can just spam the shit out of those that rank higher then us and get the penalized right? Sounds like an awesome tool Google has just given us! Let the mother phuckin floodgates of spam open!!! Shit, by the time I'm done Wordpress will be renamed WordDepressed cause of all my spam. :D

    In all honesty, Google slapping anyone for unnatural link building is stupid. If anything, they should devalue the links instead of creating a market to spam the shit out of competitor sites.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. Knoxgates

    Knoxgates Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    918
    OOPS. Got it.
     
  10. ILoveCSharp

    ILoveCSharp Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    45
    Well this is going to be new trend i suppose. Because as the days passes i see more website got penalized. And once you penalized you are basically screwed because penalization does not get removed until you remove many many backlinks.
     
  11. wokaka

    wokaka Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    866
    Likes Received:
    230
    actually it's been proven again and again since last year. I dont do this personally but i know several guys who spam all the way to their competitors and i can tell you it works. Not always work of course...
     
  12. kyaw2x

    kyaw2x Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    78
    Occupation:
    SEO
    Location:
    Queen City of the South
    Sh*t! How much more if our spam links will be discovered by Google..

    Try to search in Google.com for "website hosting reviews". His site is in #8
    is the reconsider was accepted? what do you think?
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2012
  13. XIIII

    XIIII Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    8
    No one has an obsolete answer one this. But I don't think Google penalized the website may have due to other combining factors too.

    One can simply blame that it is the work from their competitors. So what now? buying service to spam competitors' website?

    Google is in a huge dilemma for years, they are just unlucky to be a white rat for experiments.

    There is a reason why Google need G+, it is "more natural".

    Gmail accounts will be very valuable for SEO in future "only if FB is not there" lol
     
  14. ILoveCSharp

    ILoveCSharp Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    45
    i also searched via deleting all cookies and yes he is at first page

    very interesting. penalized or got warning. at the thread he mentions penalized. or maybe consideration accepted as you said.
     
  15. bigeazy

    bigeazy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    268
    Location:
    #1 to #9 on your fav SE
  16. mcklaud

    mcklaud Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    276
    Home Page:
    Hi there folks, i think you're all right and wrong at the same time, sorry!

    Not sure if it's an answer for you all or an unanswered question for me but at least half of the initial post here is true! I have a site 3 years old and before the last google update i had around 300 UV a day and around 7 keywords on the first page of google. Now i have around 3 keywords with all others from unnatural links in sandbox but the strange thing is that i receive 3x times more traffic...

    Well, after the update i did tried to improve the content and cleaned some tags and categories toobut still, the few keywords that i have left in the first page are at the bottom so i don't thing suddenly people are starting to search on google from the bottom - up !?

    Opinions !?
     
  17. assphuck

    assphuck Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,196
    Likes Received:
    905
    My opinion is you should not bump threads that have been idle for three months.