PositiveSSL vs RapidSSL
- Thread starter seoactive
- Start date
blackberry
Power Member
- Apr 26, 2009
- 719
- 242
I think that PositiveSSL will secure both www and non-www urls. This alone, in my opinion, will more than compensate for any disadvantages of being a chained-root cert such as the RapidSSL.
Both achieve the same thing however, but they are not like proper certs that will validate a business credentials (eg: proof that the business really is who they say etc).
That is why root CA certs are much more expensive.
Both achieve the same thing however, but they are not like proper certs that will validate a business credentials (eg: proof that the business really is who they say etc).
That is why root CA certs are much more expensive.
blackberry
Power Member
- Apr 26, 2009
- 719
- 242
Bit strength dosent actually matter too much as long as its over 1024 bit.
Both choices still do not do actual verification of the business.
The reason both the certs are cheap is because they are not root CA like DigitCert for example.
Both choices still do not do actual verification of the business.
The reason both the certs are cheap is because they are not root CA like DigitCert for example.
redchillies
Junior Member
- Feb 1, 2013
- 184
- 22
Rapid SSL is issued by GeoTrust while Positive SSL is issued by Comodo. That's about it.
