PHPBUILT's Idiot-Proof Guide to Authority Site Building

Status
Not open for further replies.
@phpbuilt, I've tried to send you a PM, but apparently your inbox is full. Please clear a message or two so I can send my PM, so as not to digress from the matter of this thread.
If however you would prefer that I post my message here, I will, but I don't think it's in the interest of people reading this thread to have to wade through my message to you.
 
I loved the part about over optimization and keyword research. For my it was brilliant so thank you for that.

As far as backlinks go, its all a matter of $$$ OR assets.

i.e - In my day job (seo firm) we promote our costumers in the non-us (i mean none english) market, so each seo firm around here got its own private network and a rape network. the private network goes only to our customers, the rape network goes for article/link exchanges in the hope you'll get a sucker to give you a link from his low-comp client's site or his private network.
No one is selling links down here and we can't risk our client with 'X-hat' techniques so that's all you can do to get good links.

As for the INT market, oh well, just $$ the damn thing. It's really not that hard to rank if you got proper on page and value.


Anyway, thanks for this post, as I said - loved the over optimization part, especially when the situation you said about some random non-optimized article ranking over your optimized one which happens to me a lot.
 
Last edited:
PHPbuilt, Can you please ignore replies that doesn't belong to this thread. It really doesn't worth it. You have a great thread and we want it to continue :)

And BTW, the OP removed the site in his post and you are showing it in your quote. So, I think you should edit your Quote :D
 
Last edited:
Theres so much info in here that, a single read is not enough to contain everything.. :p
 
Two things;
a) I'm going to take a lead from what duffers said, and therefore this will be my last post in this thread. If you have an issue with me, please PM me.

@phpbuilt, I've tried to send you a PM, but apparently your inbox is full. Please clear a message or two so I can send my PM, so as not to digress from the matter of this thread.
If however you would prefer that I post my message here, I will, but I don't think it's in the interest of people reading this thread to have to wade through my message to you.

Huh?
Whats happening?
This thread made me go the right way for success. Please dont bash this thread
 
Going to have to bookmark for later but I know its going to be solid info. Thanks phpbuilt
 
You should open up a service selling creating the base of a authority site... i.e theme, silo structure (categories), few mandator pages (about us, terms, policy), log and plugins. Maybe also provide a list of 50 keywords to target or something, but no blog posts - that is something people can order for themselves from the 100s of services providers on here.

Sell that shit for $100-200.


Any hoe... good share.

Cheers
 
I am awaiting for the next thread on mega-web 2.0s to establish a firm and assertive quality backlinks!
 
SECTION 3 -- KEYWORD RESEARCH

You're starting a new authority site, and you want it to rank for its main keyword. You believe it will also get many long-tail searches. How should you go about building the content? That journey starts with proper keyword research.

The idea is this -- every page on your website should rank for something very calculated and unique. If you're making a dog training site, for instance, writing 1000 articles on dog training (often reiterating the same concepts over and over) will do you no good at all -- even if every article passes copyscape. Every page on your site should be tailored to rank for a specific set of keywords that are extremely related to each other, and somewhat related to the main keyword of your authority site.

How do you do competitive research. It terms of:
1) site age
2) domain authority
3) page pagerank
4) other factors if any

Do you got for niches.

SECTION 6 -- SITE PROMOTION, BACKLINKS
If that happens, you don't want the manual reviewer to view your backlinks as obvious spun, low quality content and have half of your links devalued. Does Google do that? I don't know that they do. I don't know that they don't. You don't know that they do or don't either. Maybe they have an algorithm that does it. Who knows -- but you don't need to lose it all just because you wanted to spin 100 articles instead of hand-write them on your first tier.
Do you think that only autospun articles (content machine or wicked article creator) are bad or high quality manually spun articles (sentence and paragraph level) are bad as well?

The holy grail of backlinks is owning your own high PR blog network. I've worked with a lot of SEO companies, as well as my own network, and this has no risk. I can't imagine how Google could, or would, ever do anything about a well designed private blog network. Of course you will want to cover your tracks by eliminating footprints and proper hosting.

True, I just saw a guy ranking #1 for a 15K keyword (EMD + sufix) with their own blog network hosted on different 1$ hostings + gsa articles. Actually he uses spun content created with WAC(I guess) for the GSA blast and still doing very well.
 
Last edited:
Yep. My blog is about products too, and people shop sometimes with Google images for the types of products I sell ... so it makes sense to optimize them.

So that don't count as keyword stuffing?
 
So that don't count as keyword stuffing?

Adding images to your content is good for SEO. It adds a better experience for users and I can't see that Google would penalize you for either adding images, or properly describing them.

The difference between 1 extra keyword in the content by means of alt tag shouldn't matter that much. Its important to get your keywords 5% to 1.5% ... doesn't matter that much if its 1.3% or 1.7% because you happened to add an alt tag.
 
Amazing thread, thanks so much. I only have one question, with the "fancy widget" example. So you're saying that if I have a site based on sunglasses reviews that means I wont rank since I overuse the word sunglasses? ex."gucci sunglasses" "rayban sunglasses" This means that most review sites wont rank.
 
Last edited:
Wow - another top tier thread on BHW than you fur this phpbuilt, I;ve made a scan of some data that interest me my Tier 1 site uses a lot of plugins, never thought of the density question in that manner. bookmarked this thing to come back and read in detail. Wealth of information, thank you!
 
When you will share the web2.0's list??

Hey Mate, here is a solid list of DO-Follow web 2.0's that are sorted by PR!

wordpress.com - pr9
tumblr.com - pr8
typepad.com - pr8
weebly.com - pr8
blogger.com - pr8
tripod.com - pr8
posterous.com - pr7
jimdo.com - pr7
yola.com - pr7
squidoo.com - pr7
multiply.com - pr7
angelfire.com - pr7
officelive.com - pr7
rediff.com - pr7
wikidot.com - pr7
webs.com - pr7
webnode.com - pr7
salon.com - pr7
edublogs.org - pr6
webspawner.com - pr6
soup.io - pr6
ucoz.com - pr6
travelblog.org - pr6
gather.com - pr6
springnote.com - pr6
webstarts.com - pr6
moonfruit.com - pr6
journalspace.com - pr6
blog.de - pr6
onsugar.com - pr6
quizilla.teennick.com - pr6
areavoices.com - pr6
freeblog.hu - pr6
blog.com - pr6
blogdrive.com - pr5
blogtext.org - pr5
freeflux.net - pr5
freehostia.com - pr5
zoomshare.com - pr5
flixya.com - pr5
webgarden.com - pr5
ohlog.com - pr5
livelogcity.com - pr5
snappages.com - pr5
sosblogs.com - pr5
visualsociety.com - pr5
insanejournal.com - pr5
alivenotdead.com - pr5
hazblog.com - pr5
hpage.com - pr5
blog.com.es - pr5
350.com - pr5
beep.com - pr5
devhub.com - pr5
blog.hr - pr5
blinkweb.com - pr5
ewebsite.com - pr5
flukiest.com - pr4
bloggum.com - pr4
inube.com - pr4
iseekblog.com - pr4
hipero.com - pr4
blurty.com - pr4
bloghi.com - pr4
wallinside.com - pr4
getjealous.com - pr4
fotopages.com - pr4
wikipages.com - pr4
freeblogspot.org - pr4
myblogsite.com - pr4
spi-blog.com - pr4
2itb.com - pr4
mytripjournal.com - pr4
blogreaction.com - pr4
doomby.com - pr4
blogge.rs - pr4
mywapblog.com - pr4
yousaytoo.com - pr4
publr.com - pr3
blogster.com - pr3
weblogplaza.com - pr3
spyuser.com - pr3
bcz.com - pr3
iblog.at - pr3
honmag.com - pr3
blogpico.com - pr2
evood.com - pr2
uwcblog.com - pr2
 
Amazing thread, thanks so much. I only have one question, with the "fancy widget" example. So you're saying that if I have a site based on sunglasses reviews that means I wont rank since I overuse the word sunglasses? ex."gucci sunglasses" "rayban sunglasses" This means that most review sites wont rank.

You should probably do "gucci" "rayban" no need to stuff sunglasses anymore since people will know its a site that sells sunglasses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top