mindmaster
Elite Member
- Sep 16, 2010
- 5,671
- 3,112
My review:
I got a discount review copy so here is my honest review.
Article is readable, haven't found any grammatical mistakes. So this is a plus.
The subject is not that well researched. This doesn't match OP claims that his articles can compete with "journalistic level content".
That wouldn't be that much of a problem since I am going to use the article for web2.0. What I would recommend OP is to avoid using the keyword 6 times in a 600 words article. Especially when the keyword can't be used naturally so many times.
Speed: 4/5 (however OP mentioned that current TAT will be longer)
Readability: 4.9/5
Price: 4/5
Overall quality: 4.3/5
I got a discount review copy so here is my honest review.
Article is readable, haven't found any grammatical mistakes. So this is a plus.
The subject is not that well researched. This doesn't match OP claims that his articles can compete with "journalistic level content".
That wouldn't be that much of a problem since I am going to use the article for web2.0. What I would recommend OP is to avoid using the keyword 6 times in a 600 words article. Especially when the keyword can't be used naturally so many times.
Speed: 4/5 (however OP mentioned that current TAT will be longer)
Readability: 4.9/5
Price: 4/5
Overall quality: 4.3/5