- Aug 7, 2011
- 1,577
- 1,437
Im nearly sure this section is created to list high quality seo packages so newbies without seo knowledge can buy high quality seo package, but there are some problems as far as i see.
BHW is forcing sellers to provide defined kind of links so buyer can be nearly sure about quality but i think its wrong way (below you can find why i think its wrong way).
Instead of forcing sellers to provide some kind of links mods can (and i belive it would be much better) force every seller to provide short report on TOP (or bottom but top would be better so buyer dont have to read whole salespage) of his bst. How this could look ( created it in few minutes so it looks like shit but i want to share idea):
How many (min) = quantity in cheapest package
How many (max) = quantity in most expensive package
Problems because of forcing sellers to provide defined kind of links:
- not every seller offer all in one service but every seller want to be listed in such section to get customers, so i think manny sellers will include (for example) overpriced package to meet needs of new section, and i think its not way to go.
- 100 web 2.0 profiles / social bookmarking sites / blogs comments tell to buyer simlply nothing because seller can offer 100 pr 4+ manually created social bookmarks or 100 pligg bookmarks. Difference in quality is huge.
- BHW is beautyfull because there are no "requirements to provide this or this" in BST section so we can see many different services, from high PR web 20 guest posts to sape links. Forcing seller to provide some kind of links to be listed is wrong way to go. Controlling is ok but forcing... i dont think so.
- Indexing - linklicious or lindexed is favored by BHW so its listed as only link indexing service option? In my opinion there are better services, and many users have own private indexing systems better than public ones, so why any seller have to use this services in his package if he dont want?
Just my 2 cents
BHW is forcing sellers to provide defined kind of links so buyer can be nearly sure about quality but i think its wrong way (below you can find why i think its wrong way).
Instead of forcing sellers to provide some kind of links mods can (and i belive it would be much better) force every seller to provide short report on TOP (or bottom but top would be better so buyer dont have to read whole salespage) of his bst. How this could look ( created it in few minutes so it looks like shit but i want to share idea):
How many (min) = quantity in cheapest package
How many (max) = quantity in most expensive package
Problems because of forcing sellers to provide defined kind of links:
- not every seller offer all in one service but every seller want to be listed in such section to get customers, so i think manny sellers will include (for example) overpriced package to meet needs of new section, and i think its not way to go.
- 100 web 2.0 profiles / social bookmarking sites / blogs comments tell to buyer simlply nothing because seller can offer 100 pr 4+ manually created social bookmarks or 100 pligg bookmarks. Difference in quality is huge.
- BHW is beautyfull because there are no "requirements to provide this or this" in BST section so we can see many different services, from high PR web 20 guest posts to sape links. Forcing seller to provide some kind of links to be listed is wrong way to go. Controlling is ok but forcing... i dont think so.
- Indexing - linklicious or lindexed is favored by BHW so its listed as only link indexing service option? In my opinion there are better services, and many users have own private indexing systems better than public ones, so why any seller have to use this services in his package if he dont want?
Just my 2 cents